Morphological Differentiation of Corneal Inflammatory Cells: Proposal of Pragmatic Protocol

Author:

Schmitz Fynn12ORCID,Klimas Rafael12,Spenner Marie12,Schumacher Aurelian12,Hieke Alina12,Greiner Tineke3,Enax-Krumova Elena23,Sgodzai Melissa12,Fels Miriam12,Brünger Jil12,Huckemann Sophie12,Stude Philipp3,Tegenthoff Martin23,Gold Ralf12,Philipps Jörg4,Fisse Anna Lena12,Grüter Thomas12,Pitarokoili Kalliopi12,Motte Jeremias12ORCID,Sturm Dietrich235

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany;

2. Immune-mediated Neuropathies Biobank (INHIBIT), Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany;

3. Department of Neurology, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany;

4. Department of Neurology and Neurogeriatrics, Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden, Minden, Germany.

5. Department of Neurology, Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus, Wuppertal, Germany; and

Abstract

Purpose: Corneal confocal microscopy is a noninvasive imaging technique to analyze corneal nerve fibers and corneal inflammatory cells (CICs). The amount of CICs is a potential biomarker of disease activity in chronic autoinflammatory diseases. To date, there are no standardized criteria for the morphological characterization of CICs. The aim was to establish a protocol for a standardized morphological classification of CICs based on a literature search and to test this protocol for applicability and reliability. Methods: A systematic review of the literature about definitions of CICs was conducted. Existing morphological descriptions were translated into a structured algorithm and applied by raters. Subsequently, the protocol was optimized by reducing and defining the criteria of the cell types. The optimized algorithm was applied by 4 raters. The interrater reliability was calculated using Fleiss kappa (K). Results: A systematic review of the literature revealed no uniform morphological criteria for the differentiation of the individual cell types in CICs. Our first protocol achieved only a low level of agreement between 3 raters (K = 0.09; 1062 rated cells). Our revised protocol was able to achieve a higher interrater reliability with 3 (K = 0.64; 471 rated cells) and 4 (K = 0.61; 628 rated cells) raters. Conclusions: The indirect use of criteria from the literature leads to a high error rate. By clearly defining the individual cell types and standardizing the protocol, reproducible results were obtained, allowing the introduction of this protocol for the future evaluation of CICs in the corneal confocal microscopy.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference40 articles.

1. In vivo confocal microscopy of the human cornea in the assessment of peripheral neuropathy and systemic diseases;Wang;Biomed Res Int,2015

2. Corneal confocal microscopy: ready for prime time;Petropoulos;Clin Exp Optom,2020

3. Clinical applications of corneal confocal microscopy;Tavakoli;Clin Ophthalmol,2008

4. Morphology of corneal nerves using confocal microscopy;Oliveira-Soto;Cornea,2001

5. Mapping of the normal human corneal sub-Basal nerve plexus by in vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy;Patel;Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2005

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3