Understanding and Addressing Bias in Grading: Progress at Washington University School of Medicine

Author:

Colson Eve R.1,Pérez Maria2,Chibueze Stanley3,De Fer Thomas M.4,Emke Amanda R.5,Lawrence Steven J.6,Wilson Sherree A.7,Zehnder Nichole G.8,Aagaard Eva M.9

Affiliation:

1. E.R. Colsonis professor of pediatrics and associate dean for program evaluation and continuous quality improvement, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.

2. M. Pérezis clinical research specialist, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.

3. S. Chibuezeis a fourth-year medical student, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.

4. T.M. De Feris professor of medicine and associate dean for medical student education, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.

5. A.R. Emkeis associate professor of pediatrics and assistant dean for assessment, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.

6. S.J. Lawrenceis professor of medicine and assistant dean for curriculum, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.

7. S.A. Wilsonis associate vice chancellor and associate dean for diversity, equity, and inclusion, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.

8. N.G. Zehnderis associate professor of medicine and associate dean for education strategy, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.

9. E.M. Aagaardis professor of medicine, vice chancellor and senior associate dean for medical education, and the Carol B and Jerome T Professor of Medical Education, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.

Abstract

In 2020, the authors published work examining disparities in clerkship grading and found students who identify as White were more likely to receive honors grades compared with students from races/ethnicities traditionally underrepresented in medicine. Through a quality improvement approach, the authors identified the following 6 areas where improvements could mitigate grading disparities and, therefore, put processes in place to: ensure equitable access to examination preparation resources, change student assessment, develop medical student curriculum interventions, improve the learning environment, change house staff and faculty recruitment and retention practices, and provide ongoing program evaluation and continuous quality improvement processes to monitor for success. While the authors cannot yet be sure that they have achieved their goal of promoting equity in grading, they believe this evidence-based, multipronged intervention is a clear step in the right direction and encourage other schools to consider a similar approach to tackling this critically important problem at their own institutions.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3