A Social Network Analysis of Influences on Residents’ Value-Based Decisions

Author:

Bock Lotte A.1ORCID,Westra Daan2,Noben Cindy Y.G.3,Essers Brigitte A.B.4,van Mook Walther N.K.A.5

Affiliation:

1. L.A. Bockis a PhD student, Academy of Postgraduate Medical Education, Maastricht University Medical Centre, and School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; ORCID:.

2. D. Westrais assistant professor, Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; ORCID:.

3. C.Y.G. Nobenis strategic and medical educational advisor, Academy of Postgraduate Medical Education, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; ORCID:.

4. B.A.B. Essersis senior researcher, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; ORCID:.

5. W.N.K.A. van Mookis medical doctor and full professor, Academy of Postgraduate Medical Education, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, and School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; ORCID:.

Abstract

Purpose To ensure a value-based health care system, it is becoming increasingly important that residents are trained in making value-based decisions. This study explored the social network influencing residents’ value-based decisions. Method To explore the social network influencing residents’ value-based decisions, the authors used a semistructured individual and mini-group interviewing approach and participatory visual mapping. In total, 17 residents across 13 different specialties were interviewed from the southeastern postgraduate medical education and training region of the Netherlands, May–November 2021. Two researchers independently coded the transcribed data using an integrated inductive thematic approach. Subsequently, social network analysis was used to visualize the results. Results Residents indicated that their value-based decisions were influenced by direct actors who influenced decisions related to patients and indirect actors who shaped decisions related to patients without directly modifying them. Different interaction-aspects (i.e., personal, situational, and institutional) further affected residents’ ability to make value-based decisions. Thus, residents’ value-based decisions were a product of the interplay between various interactions with actors and different interaction-aspects. Residents defined value-based decisions differently, even within an interview. Conclusions These results suggest residents’ value-based decisions are influenced by a multitude of actors, including hierarchically superior colleagues who can directly alter decisions and patients (and their families) and nurses with whom residents consider it important to maintain good relationships. In addition, more experienced actors, mainly from the medical and nursing profession, contribute most to learning. Furthermore, residents’ value-based decisions are deeply underpinned by the hidden curriculum. However, many senior physicians may not have received sufficient training in the concept of value-based health care. Consequently, an approach of formally educating residents in value-based health care will likely have limited effects unless social influences in day-to-day clinical settings reinforce its importance.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Reference41 articles.

1. The Triple Aim: Care, health, and cost.;Berwick;Health Aff,2008

2. The Quadruple Aim: Care, health, cost and meaning in work.;Sikka;BMJ Qual Saf,2015

3. What is value in health care?;Porter;N Engl J Med,2010

4. How physicians can change the future of health care.;Porter;JAMA,2007

5. Change the microenvironment: Delivery system reform essential to controlling costs.;Crosson;Mod Healthc,2009

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3