Why Are There So Few Women Medical School Deans? Debunking the Myth That Shorter Tenures Drive Disparities

Author:

Gottlieb Amy S.1,Roy Brita2,Herrin Jeph3,Holaday Louisa W.4,Weiss Jasmine5,Salazar Michelle C.6,Okoli Ngozi7,Nagarkatti Nupur8,Otridge Jeremy7,Pomeroy Claire9

Affiliation:

1. was associate dean for faculty affairs and professor, Departments of Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, UMass Chan Medical School–Baystate, Springfield, Massachusetts, at the time of writing and is now incoming vice dean for faculty affairs, advancement, and inclusion, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

2. is clinical associate professor, Departments of Population Health and Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.

3. is assistant professor, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, and a researcher, Flying Buttress Associates, Charlottesville, Virginia.

4. is assistant professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and the Institute for Health Equity Research, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

5. >is assistant professor, Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

6. r is a general surgery resident, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, and former fellow of the National Clinician Scholars Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

7. is a graduate student, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.

8. is postdoctoral associate, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

9. is president, Albert and Mary Lasker Foundation, New York, New York.

Abstract

Purpose: Gender disparities among the senior echelons of academic medicine are striking and persistent. The role of medical school dean has been particularly immune to gender diversity, and limited prior research identified women’s shorter decanal tenures as a potential driver. The authors assessed gender differences in tenure length of deanships in the current era to elucidate this finding. Method; From October 2020 to June 2021, the authors collected information about medical school deanships that were held from January 1, 2006, to June 30, 2020. All schools were members of the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). The authors collected data from online public records and augmented their findings via direct outreach to medical schools. They used time to event analyses before and after adjustment for interim vs permanent status of the initial appointment, school ownership (public/private), and school size to assess for gender differences in length of deanship tenure during the study period. The unit of analysis was deanships, and the primary outcome was length of deanships measured in years. Results: Authors included data on 528 deanships. Women held 91 (17%) of these terms. Men held the majority of permanent deanships (n = 352 [85%]). A greater percentage of the deanships held by women were interim only (n = 27 [30%]) compared with men (n = 85 [20%]). In unadjusted and adjusted analyses, there were no significant gender differences in length of deanship tenures. Conclusions: Analysis of appointments of AAMC-member medical school deans from 2006 to 2020 revealed that women have remained in their deanships as long their male counterparts. The myth about women deans’ shorter longevity should no longer be promulgated. Academic medicine should consider novel solutions to addressing women’s persistent underrepresentation in the dean role, including employing the gender proportionality principle used in the business and legal communities.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3