A 7-Domain Framework That Can Bridge Clinical Care, Health Systems Science, and Health Equity: Lessons From the H&P 360

Author:

Williams Brent C.1,Hayer Rupinder2,Henderson David D.3,Johnson Eric L.4,Kulkarni-Date Mrinalini5,Tang Joyce W.6,Whisenant Ebony B.7,Kirley Kate8,

Affiliation:

1. is professor, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; ORCID:.

2. is senior program manager, Improving Health Outcomes, American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois; ORCID:.

3. is professor and chair, Department of Family Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut.

4. is professor and director of interprofessional education, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, North Dakota; ORCID:.

5. is associate professor, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Education, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas, Austin, Texas.

6. is assistant professor, Section of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; ORCID:.

7. is associate professor, Department of Public Health, A.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Mesa, Arizona.

8. is director of chronic disease prevention, Improving Health Outcomes, American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois; ORCID:.

Abstract

The H&P 360 is a reconceptualized history and physical (H&P), which clinical medical students have reported reveals clinically relevant information not elicited by the traditional H&P, informs care planning, promotes interprofessional team care, and enhances patient rapport. In addition to the traditional checklist focused on patients’ medical conditions, the H&P 360 includes prompts for gathering limited but critical information in 6 other domains directly relevant to patients’ overall health—patient values, goals, and priorities; mental health; behavioral health; social support; living environment and resources; and function. Clinicians are thus reminded to elicit relevant information from each domain appropriate to the context of each clinical encounter. As health systems explore ways to identify and address social drivers of health, medical schools are rapidly expanding curricula beyond biomedical conditions, as reflected in the multifaceted health systems science curriculum. Many of today’s medical students struggle to find connections among the core tasks of mastering biomedical clinical medicine, their evolving professional identity and career trajectory, and addressing systemic and societal barriers to population health. The authors argue that the 7-domain framework can serve as a conceptual bridge that links the care of individual patients with topics in the health systems science curriculum to promote health equity. The authors provide illustrative examples of the 7 domains as an organizing lens that can promote curiosity and understanding of seemingly disparate topics, such as interpersonal violence, social drivers of health, and structural racism, as well as help students expand and define their professional identities as physicians beyond diagnosis and treatment of biomedical conditions. The authors invite discussion and experimentation around the use of the 7-domain framework in teaching, assessment, and curriculum development and point to resources for clinical educators for teaching and measuring the effects of the H&P 360 on learners, preceptors, and patients.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Education,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3