Strategies for Advancing Equity in Frontline Clinical Assessment

Author:

Onumah Chavon M.1,Pincavage Amber T.2,Lai Cindy J.3,Levine Diane L.4,Ismail Nadia J.5,Alexandraki Irene6,Osman Nora Y.7

Affiliation:

1. C.M. Onumahis associate professor, Department of Medicine, George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.

2. A.T. Pincavageis professor, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

3. C.J. Laiis professor and director of medical student clinical education, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.

4. D.L. Levineis professor and vice chair for education, Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.

5. N.J. Ismailis professor, Department of Medicine and Department of Education, Innovation and Technology, and vice dean, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

6. I. Alexandrakiis professor and senior associate dean, academic affairs, Office of Academic Affairs, University of Arizona College of Medicine–Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona.

7. N.Y. Osmanis associate professor, Harvard Medical School, and director of undergraduate medical education, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Abstract

Educational equity in medicine cannot be achieved without addressing assessment bias. Assessment bias in health professions education is prevalent and has extensive implications for learners and, ultimately, the health care system. Medical schools and educators desire to minimize assessment bias, but there is no current consensus on effective approaches. Frontline teaching faculty have the opportunity to mitigate bias in clinical assessment in real time. Based on their experiences as educators, the authors created a case study about a student to illustrate ways bias affects learner assessment. In this paper, the authors use their case study to provide faculty with evidence-based approaches to mitigate bias and promote equity in clinical assessment. They focus on 3 components of equity in assessment: contextual equity, intrinsic equity, and instrumental equity. To address contextual equity, or the environment in which learners are assessed, the authors recommend building a learning environment that promotes equity and psychological safety, understanding the learners’ contexts, and undertaking implicit bias training. Intrinsic equity, centered on the tools and practices used during assessment, can be promoted by using competency-based, structured assessment methods and employing frequent, direct observation to assess multiple domains. Instrumental equity, focused on communication and how assessments are used, includes specific, actionable feedback to support growth and use of competency-based narrative descriptors in assessments. Using these strategies, frontline clinical faculty members can actively promote equity in assessment and support the growth of a diverse health care workforce.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3