Author:
Marhoffer Elizabeth A.,Ein-Alshaeba Samer,Grimshaw Alyssa A.,Holleck Jürgen L.,Rudikoff Benjamin,Bastian Lori A.,Gunderson Craig G.
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The gender gap in promotion in academic medicine is well established. However, few studies have reported gender differences in promotion adjusted for scholarly production and national or international reputation, namely, career duration, publications, grant funding, and leadership positions. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the differences between men and women in achieving benchmarks for promotion and analyze where such differences lie geographically and within specialties.
Method
A systematic search of Academic Search Premier, Business Source Complete, Cochrane Library, ERIC, GenderWatch, Google Scholar, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted from inception to August 17, 2022. All studies that reported the number of male and female full professors on medical school faculty were included. The primary outcome was the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for promotion to full professor for women compared with men.
Results
Two hundred forty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. The unadjusted OR for promotion to full professor for women was 0.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36–0.41). Sixteen studies reported an AOR. The pooled AOR of promotion for women to full professor was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.46–0.77). The AOR for promotion to full professor was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.34–0.88) in surgery and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.57–1.11) in internal medicine. Statistical heterogeneity was high (Q = 66.6, I
2 = 79.4%, P < .001). On meta-regression, 77% of the heterogeneity was from studies outside the United States, where more disparity was reported (AOR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.22–0.38).
Conclusions
Most studies continued to find decreased promotion of women. Gender disparity was particularly notable in surgery and in studies from outside the United States. The results suggest that differences in promotion were due to differences in productivity and leadership and to gender bias.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference64 articles.
1. The gender gap in Italian academic medicine from 2005 to 2015: still a glass ceiling;Med Lav,2019
2. Japan’s academic barriers to gender equality as seen in a comparison of public and private medical schools: a cross-sectional study;Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle),2022
3. Gender disparity in academic orthopedic programs in Canada: a cross-sectional study;Can J Surg,2022
4. Predicting when women will achieve equitable representation in four specialties: the WHEN study;Am J Med,2022
5. Achieving gender equity in physician compensation and career advancement: a position paper of the American College of Physicians;Ann Intern Med,2018