Necessity of Pretests in Central Venous Catheter Insertion Simulation-Based Mastery Learning: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Barsuk Jeffrey H.1,Mitra Debi2,Cohen Elaine R.3,Wayne Diane B.4

Affiliation:

1. is Robert Hirschtick Professor of Medicine and professor of medicine and medical education, Department of Medicine and Medical Education, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

2. is assistant professor of medicine, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

3. is research associate, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

4. is professor of medicine and medical education, Department of Medicine and Medical Education, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

Abstract

Purpose Simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) is a rigorous form of competency-based learning. Components of SBML include a pretest, deliberate practice, and a posttest; all learners must meet or exceed a minimum passing standard (MPS) on the posttest before completing training. The authors aimed to explore whether a modified SBML curriculum (without a pretest assessment) was as effective as the standard SBML curriculum (with a pretest assessment). Method The authors performed a randomized controlled trial of internal medicine residents who participated in an internal jugular central venous catheter insertion SBML curriculum at a tertiary care academic medical center in Chicago, Illinois, from December 2018 through December 2021. Residents were randomly assigned to complete the usual SBML intervention (pretest group) or to complete a modified SBML intervention without a pretest (no pretest group). The authors compared initial posttest performance and training time between groups. Results Eighty-nine of 120 eligible residents (74.1%) completed the study: 43 in the pretest group and 46 in the no pretest group. Median (IQR) initial posttest scores were not statistically different between the pretest group (96.6 [93.1–100]) and the no pretest group (96.6 [92.4–100]). However, all 43 residents (100%) in the pretest group reached the MPS at the initial posttest compared with 41 of the 46 (89%) in the no pretest group (P = .06). Residents in the pretest group required 16.5 hours more faculty and learning time than the no pretest group. Conclusions More residents who completed a pretest reached the MPS at initial posttest. However, incorporating a pretest during the internal jugular central venous catheter SBML curriculum required substantially more learner and faculty time without clear performance benefits.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3