Clinical Significance of Diplopia and the Orthoptic Examination in Zygomatic Maxillary Complex Fractures

Author:

Nastro Siniscalchi Enrico1,Lo Giudice Giorgio1,Calvo Alessandro1,Marino Raffaele2,Bonavolontà Paola3,Dell’Aversana Orabona Giovanni3,Squillacioti Antonella1,Catalfamo Luciano Maria1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical, Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, Maxillo-Facial Surgery Unit, University Hospital “G. Martino”, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, Messina

2. Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Piazzale Salvatore Tommasi 1, Coppito, L’Aquila

3. Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy

Abstract

Literature describes variable rates of diplopia of associated with zygomatic maxillary complex (ZMC) fractures (6% to 40%). The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the prevalence of diplopia in ZMC fracture patients, the usefulness of the orthoptic evaluation compared with the clinical finger-tracking examination, and to seek possible relations of this symptom with clinical parameters. Data of patients attending the Maxillofacial Surgery Units of the University of Messina and University of Naples “Federico II”, between January 2012 and December 2022 were retrieved. Statistical analysis of positive versus negative diplopia at both the clinical examination and the orthoptic evaluation and subgroup analysis were performed. 320 patients were included in the analysis. 50 (15.6%) patients reported diplopia at the clinical examination, whereas 70 (21.9%) resulted positive at the orthoptic evaluation. Statistical analysis for every determinant and subgroup did not show statistical significance (P>0.05). Performing routine preoperative orthoptic evaluation allowed an increase of 6.3% in positive reports. Although it seems that no basic clinical parameter can predict diplopia, results suggest that the orthoptic evaluation is superior in the assessment of this symptom. Clinical analysis was shown to be a moderate/low efficient test and should not be used as a decisional standard.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference24 articles.

1. Evidence-based medicine: zygoma fractures;Ellstrom;Plast Reconstr Surg,2013

2. Detecting binocular diplopia in orbital floor blowout fractures: superiority of the orthoptic approach;Timkovic;Medicina (Kaunas),2021

3. Prevalence of ocular complications in patients with zygomatic bone fractures in an Iranian population;Hashemi;Front Dent,2020

4. Ophthalmic injuries in orbito-zygomatic fractures;Riaz;J Coll Physicians Surg Pak,2014

5. Ophthalmic involvement in cranio-facial trauma;Amrith;J Craniomaxillofac Surg,2000

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3