Lefort 1 Osteotomy Study of Maxillary Bone in Caprine Skull Model: Comparison of Different Osteotomy Techniques (Piezo Versus Lindemann Bur Versus Manual Chisel)

Author:

Serin Merdan1,Altinel Dinçer2,Toplu Gaye3,Rakici Ibrahim Taşkın4,Toplu Selçuk Göksel5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Esthetic Surgery, Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, Medeniyet University

2. Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Esthetic Surgery, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University

3. Private practice in Plastic, Reconstructive and Esthetic Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey

4. Department of Radiology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Istanbul, Turkey

5. Department of Biostatistics and Medical IT, Health Sciences Institute, Duzce University, Duzce, Turkey

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare the efficiency of different osteotomy techniques for Lefort 1 osteotomy in an experimental caprine skull model. Methods: Twelve caprine skulls were used for the study. Skulls were divided into 3 groups: (1) manual chisel group, (2) Lindemann bur group, and (3) piezo osteotomy group. Bilateral osteotomies were performed on each skull. Results were evaluated with three-dimensional computerized tomography scans and macroscopic observations of the mucosal tears and soft tissue. Results: The mean length of the bone gap in the manual, Lindemann, and piezo groups was 4.8 (±0.7), 3.38 (±1.49), and 1.39 (±0.3) mm, respectively (P < 0.05). The mean number of comminuted fractures in the manual, Lindemann, and piezo groups was 5.5 (±1.4), 1.6 (±0.3), and 0.6 (±0.5), respectively (P < 0.05). Mucosal tearing and soft tissue damage based on subjective inspection observations were negligible in the piezo technique. Soft tissue and mucosal damage were observed significantly more in the manual chisel osteotomy method compared with the other 2 techniques. Conclusion: We anticipate that piezo, which has started to be used in new application areas besides rhinoplasty, will continue to be used more widely, especially in reconstructive orthognathic surgery, due to the minimal damage it causes to tissues. With the long-term results, much healthier interpretations can be made.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference42 articles.

1. Current trends in orthognathic surgery;Seo;Arch Craniofac Surg,2021

2. Distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery: demystifying differences in concepts, techniques and outcomes;Ramanathan;J Maxillofac Oral Surg,2020

3. Stability of vertical, horizontal and angular parameters following superior repositioning of maxilla by Le Fort I osteotomy: a cephalometric study;Venkategowda;J Clin Diagn Res,2017

4. Long-term soft tissue changes after orthodontic and surgical corrections of skeletal class III malocclusions;Bailey;Angle Orthod,2007

5. An overview of surgery-first orthognathic approach: history, indications and limitations, protocols, and dentoskeletal stability;Alavi;Dent Res J,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3