Prelaminated Nose Reconstruction: Comparison of Forehead and Radial Donor Site and Review of the Literature

Abstract

Introduction: Total nose reconstruction is demanding as it is a 3-dimensional structure that needs lining, support and external coverage. Usually, several stages are needed to achieve a satisfactory result. The authors present 2 cases of prelaminated radial forearm and 2 prelaminated forehead nose reconstructions and compare both methods. According to our review of the literature, this is the first report of prelaminated forehead for total nose reconstruction. Materials and Methods: The last 5 years the authors have treated 4 patients with prelaminated flaps for total nose reconstruction. The age ranged from 50 to 75 years. There were 3 male patients and one female. Three patients underwent total nose amputation due to squamous cell carcinoma and one due to melanoma. Results: Two patients were treated with prelaminated radial forearm reconstruction and 2 with prelaminated forehead reconstruction. Both patients that were treated with prelaminated radial forearm reconstruction had the collapse of the nasal pyramid and had salvage procedures with replacement of the cartilaginous framework with iliac bone graft framework. Conclusions: Prelaminated nose reconstruction with either the radial forearm or forehead flap needs several stages. There is the possibility of infection-collapse of the cartilage framework, therefore, the authors recommend reconstruction of the nasal skeleton with an iliac bone graft. The flaps are stiff and difficult to handle. The authors don’t think that prelaminated nose reconstruction with the radial forearm flap has advantage compared with the classic several stages nose reconstruction with radial forearm flap. Possibly, prelaminated forehead reconstruction can be applied for aged patients who cannot undergo microsurgical reconstruction.