Assessing the Current State of Microtia Reconstruction in the United States

Author:

Reddy Narainsai K.1,Shah Nikhil D.2,Alias Basil P.1,Allison Sophia2,Chwa Emily S.2,Yamada Akira23

Affiliation:

1. Engineering Medicine (EnMed), Texas A&M School of Medicine, Houston, TX

2. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University

3. Division of Plastic Surgery, Lurie Children’s Hospital, Chicago, IL

Abstract

Objective: Microtia is a congenital ear deformity with variability in surgical techniques and tools across surgeons pursuing an autologous reconstruction. Different techniques have emerged over time, and surgeons opt for various tools to aid in creating the complex three-dimensional cartilaginous ear framework. The purpose of this study was to understand the current state of microtia reconstruction in the United States. Methods: Microtia surgeons affiliated with the nonprofit, Ear Community, were invited to complete a 20-item survey. Data were collected on demographic information regarding surgeons, considerations when approaching microtia repair in patients, and techniques and comfort levels. Additional data were collected on materials, tools, flaps, and skin grafts used for reconstruction. Results: Twenty-two surgeons responded to the survey reporting 3 different techniques learned and utilized in practice including the Brent, Nagata, and Firmin techniques. About two-thirds of surgeons were “extremely comfortable” with their techniques and one-third were “extremely uncomfortable” or “somewhat uncomfortable.” Most respondents reported using a tunneled temporoparietal fascial flap or a posterior fascial flap along with a full-thickness skin graft for the second stage (ear elevation). Most surgeons utilized a combination of scalpels and gouges when carving the ear framework along with sutures or wire. Conclusions: This study highlights the current state of autogenous microtia reconstruction underscoring the variability in approaches and preferences. These data may guide future directions that aim to improve patient outcomes. Surgeons may gain insight into different practices and choose to adopt different aspects to enhance their surgical approach.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3