Malignancy and “Violated Neck” Rates in Consecutive Cohort of 79 Adult Patients With Solitary Cystic Neck Mass—Lessons Learned and Recommendations for Clinical Practice Guidelines

Author:

Pupić-Bakrač Jure1,Jayasekara Sandeep2,Peiris Prasangi M.2,Jayasinghe Liyanaarachchige A.H.2,Kapugama Kanchana2,Jayasuriya Nadeena S.S.2,Wijekoon Parakrama2,Attygalla Manjula2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, General Hospital Zadar, Zadar, Croatia

2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka

Abstract

Objective: The neck region is a common site for solitary cystic neck mass (SCNM) of various etiologies, including congenital, inflammatory, and neoplastic. In adults, the primary focus is excluding malignancy. The objective of this study was to retrospectively analyze the accuracy of available diagnostic technologies for the differentiation of benign and malignant SCNM in adult patients. The study aimed to develop new clinical practice guidelines for evaluating and managing SCNM. Methods: The primary predictive variables were the diagnostic utilities of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), ultrasound (U/S), multislice computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. The study’s endpoint was the overall diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between benign and malignant SCNM. The final diagnosis was based on histopathology. Results: The study included 79 adult patients: 55 (69.62%) male and 24 (30.38%) female (P<0.05). The mean age at presentation was 42.1 years (range: 18–84 years). Solitary cystic neck mass was distributed in the anterior neck region in 30 (37.97%) patients and the posterolateral neck regions in 49 (62.03%) patients (P<0.05). The posterolateral neck regions had a significantly higher rate of malignant SCNM than the anterior neck region [19/49 (38.78%) versus 1/30 (3.33%)] (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the U/S+FNAC and U/S+FNAC+multislice computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging groups in differentiating benign and malignant SCNM (40/42 versus 36/37, P>0.05). “Violated neck” was recorded in 2 cases. Conclusion: A systematic investigation protocol should be applied to evaluate adult patients with SCNM.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3