Bacterial Growth in Unsealed Bone-grafting Products

Author:

Shmuly Tom12,Hater Amer3,Bar-Ness Greenstein Ronit4,Allon Dror Michael15

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv

2. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot

3. Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel-Aviv University

4. Oral Biology Department, Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University

5. Orthognathic and TMJ Surgery Unit, Assuta Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to simulate reusing an opened package of bone substitute (BS) under typical clinical conditions, by analyzing bacterial growth in samples of resealed packages of alloplast and xenograft BS following different time periods up to a week. Materials and Methods: The experiment was performed in 2 stages: dry stage and wet stage. In the dry stage, BS samples were exposed to air for 15 minutes and then were sealed again in their original package. After several “aging” periods [no aging (t0), 24 hours (t1), and 1 week (t7)], BS samples were plated onto brain heart infusion agar and were incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours under aerobic conditions. Bacterial colonies were enumerated and colony forming units per 1 mL was calculated. In the wet stage, the experiment was repeated but BSs were left to age in a brain heart infusion broth to simulate a more supporting humid environment to encourage bacterial growth. Results: In the dry stage of the experiment, no bacterial growth was detected in both xenograft and alloplast samples (colony forming units/mL=0), in any of the time points (t0, t1, t7). In the wet stage, average bacterial growth was 0 for both groups in t0. In t1: 1.14 × 104±4.16 × 103 for the xenograft and 7.73 × 105± 9.99 × 105 for the alloplast. In t7: 1.64 × 109±1.82 × 108 in the xenograft compared with 8.86 × 108±4.00 × 108 for the alloplast. Analysis of variance with repeated measures showed a significant difference in comparison of the 2 BSs for each time group (t1 and t7) (P<0.005). Conclusion: Under dry conditions, in a resealed package, there was no bacterial growth for up to 1 week for both BSs. Once the BSs are introduced to a humid environment, which supports bacterial growth, the xenograft BS allowed more rapid bacterial growth, compared with the alloplastic BS.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery

Reference12 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3