Pressure Onto the Orbital Walls and Orbital Morphology in Orbital Floor or Medial Wall Fracture: A 3-Dimensional Printer Study

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to compare the pressure onto the orbital floor and medial orbital wall between 3-dimensional printer skull models with unilateral orbital floor and medial orbital wall fractures and to compare the morphology of the orbital floor and medial orbital wall between patients with unilateral orbital floor and medial orbital wall fractures. The skull models were created based on computed tomographic (CT) data obtained from every 10 patients with unilateral orbital floor and medial orbital wall fractures. The orbital spaces of these models were filled with silicone, the silicone surface was pushed down, and pressures onto the orbital floor and the medial orbital wall were measured. On preoperative computed tomographic images taken in the same 20 patients, the superior and lateral bulges of the orbital floor and medial orbital wall were measured, respectively. The measurements were done on the unaffected sides. Consequently, the pressure onto the orbital floor was significantly higher in the orbital floor fracture models than in the medial orbital wall fracture models, although the pressure onto the medial orbital wall was not significantly different between the models. As for the morphologic study, the superior bulge of the orbital floor was higher in the orbital floor fracture group than in the medial orbital wall fracture group. The results of this study indicate that since the orbital floor with a high superior bulge receives high hydraulic pressure, patients with a high superior bulge have a greater risk of orbital floor fracture.