Modeling Methods in Craniofacial Virtual Surgical Planning

Author:

Riordan Edward12ORCID,Yung Amanda23,Cheng Kai4,Lim Lydia5,Clark Jonathan467,Rtshiladze Michael289,Ch’ng Sydney246710

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plastic Surgery, St George Hospital

2. Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney

3. Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney

4. Royal Prince Alfred Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney Local Health District

5. Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Westmead Hospital

6. Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney

7. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse Cancer Centre

8. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sydney Children’s Hospital Randwick

9. Department of Plastic Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital

10. Department of Plastic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of virtual surgical planning (VSP), few papers describe the modeling methods used to generate the digital simulations that underpin VSP. This paper aims to review the modeling methods that are currently available for use in VSP and the implications of their use in clinical practice. A literature review was undertaken of the two broad categories of modeling techniques; contour-based planning—namely mirroring from the contralateral side, templating from a normative database, and extrapolation from surrounding landmarks—and occlusal-based planning (OBP). The indications for each modeling method were discussed, including mandibular/maxillary reconstruction, pediatric craniofacial surgery, and orthognathic, as well as the limitations to the accuracy of modeling types. Unilateral defects of the upper/midface, wherein contour accuracy is paramount, are best reconstructed using mirroring methods, whereas bilateral defects—or cases with asymmetry due to craniofacial dysmorphology—are most suited to normative-data-based methods. Cases involving resection of the alveolar margin, in which functional occlusion is the primary outcome are best managed with OBP. Similarly, orthognathic surgery typically uses OBP, although complex cases involving asymmetry, such as clefts, may benefit from a combination of OBP and normative data methods. The choice of modeling methods is, therefore, largely driven by the defect type and the goals of reconstruction.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3