Utility of Regional Maxillary Nerve Blocks in Improving Cleft Palate Postoperative Outcomes

Author:

Jacobs-El Hannah1,Samuel Ankhita2,Chen Xizhao1,Yemen Terrance3,Gampper Thomas2,Black Jonathan2

Affiliation:

1. The University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia

2. The University of Virginia Hospital, Department of Plastic Surgery, Charlottesville, Virginia

3. The University of Virginia Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Charlottesville, Virginia

Abstract

Background: Palatoplasty procedures used to repair cleft palates are commonly associated with limiting postoperative pain. Regional anesthetic blocks have been utilized to improve pain outcomes and decrease opioid intake, yet additional data is needed to fully explore its utility in this setting. Objective: To explore whether ultrasound-guided suprazygomatic maxillary blocks (SMB) improve postoperative pain, postoperative opioid use, time to oral feeding, and length of stay compared with a palatal field block in cleft palate repair. Methods: In this retrospective chart review, 47 patients aged 9 to 25 months who underwent cleft palate repair between 2013 and 2020 were allocated into 2 groups: a control group where patients received only palatal local anesthetic in a field block fashion (N=29), and Maxillary block group who received ultrasound-guided SMB (N=18). Patients were matched by age and cleft Veau type. The primary outcomes were total postoperative morphine equivalent consumption, average pain scores, length of stay, and time to first oral feed. Results: Comparing field block versus SMB groups, there was not a statistical difference in the overall dose of postoperative morphine equivalent opioid administration (11.71 vs. 13.36 mg; P=0.483), average pain scores (5.78 vs. 5.27; P=0.194), time to first oral feed [17.21 vs. 14.48 h; P=0.407, 95% CI: (−3.85, 9.32)] or length of stay (P=0.292). Conclusion: The use of SMBs did not demonstrate a difference in the postoperative outcomes evaluated by this study. Further study is needed to define its utility in cleft palate repair

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3