Toward More Equitable Care: A Closer Look at Autism Clinic Intake Practices and Paperwork

Author:

Srinivasan Anisha P.12ORCID,Nishiguchi Erika Phelps34,Gonzalez Cassandra5,Jimenez Manuel E.678910,Zuckerman Katharine E.11,Lion Katherine C.1213

Affiliation:

1. Division of Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA;

2. MIND Institute, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA;

3. Department of Pediatrics, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI;

4. Division of Community Pediatrics, Hawai'i Pacific Health, Kapi'Olani Medical Center for Women and Children, Honolulu, HI;

5. Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ;

6. Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ;

7. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ;

8. Child Health Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ;

9. Boggs Center on Developmental Disabilities, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ;

10. Children's Specialized Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ;

11. Division of General Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR;

12. Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA;

13. Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA.

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objective: To describe intake requirements among autism clinics and to assess how well intake paperwork aligns with national standards for enhancing language and literacy accessibility. Methods: This was a survey of 126 autism clinics in the Children's Hospital Association, assessing intake processes and intake paperwork readability conducted between November 2021 and August 2022. Descriptive analyses characterized intake requirements and paperwork components. Free-text responses about intake support strategies were categorized into themes. Logistic regression models examined associations between clinic patient demographics and odds of requiring intake paperwork. Intake packet length, content, and reading grade level were examined. Results: Of the invited clinics, 73% completed the survey. Among the participating clinics, 55% required intake paperwork before scheduling appointments, 34% offered English forms only, and 89% had no plain language forms. Clinic patient demographics were not associated with intake paperwork requirements. Analyzed intake packets (n = 67) averaged 11 pages long, and most were written above the fifth-grade reading level. Most packets solicited medical, developmental, and educational/therapy history. Many also requested psychoeducational evaluations and teacher rating forms. Reported intake support strategies for families with language or literacy needs included making ad hoc exceptions to the usual process, task shifting to outside organizations, providing support at family's request, and delegating to support staff. Conclusion: Many autism clinics nationwide require intake paperwork before diagnostic evaluation. Many clinics offer intake paperwork in English only, and paperwork often does not meet health literacy standards. Reducing paperwork requirements and providing more routine and robust intake support may facilitate equitable access to autism diagnostic evaluations.

Funder

Seattle Children’s Hospital

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3