Assessment of haemostasis in pregnant women

Author:

Zec Tamara,Schmartz Denis,Temmerman Pomeline,Fils Jean-François,Ickx Brigitte,Bonhomme Fanny,Van Der Linden Philippe

Abstract

BACKGROUND Contemporary guidelines pertaining to the evaluation of bleeding risk recommend conducting a comprehensive examination of both personal and family histories concerning haemorrhagic diatheses. OBJECTIVES We employed the standardised HEMSTOP (Hematoma, hEmorrhage, Menorrhagia, Surgery, Tooth extraction, Obstetrics, Parents) questionnaire in pregnant women to evaluate its efficacy in detecting a haemostatic disorder and predicting the risk of haemorrhage associated with delivery. DESIGN A single-centre retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING Brugmann Hospital, a tertiary university institution. PATIENTS All full-term parturients who underwent vaginal or caesarean delivery in our hospital between January 2020 and December 2021 were included in the study. A total of 3588 patients were enrolled. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the HEMSTOP questionnaire in identifying individuals with an abnormal primary haemostatic profile. The secondary objective was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the HEMSTOP questionnaire in predicting postpartum haemorrhage (PPH; defined as blood loss >1000 ml). Additionally, positive-predictive values and negative-predictive values (NPVs) were calculated. RESULTS The specificity and sensitivity of the HEMSTOP questionnaire to predict an abnormal standard coagulation test in pregnant women are respectively 96% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95 to 0.97] and 39% (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.61). Its NPV is 100%. The specificity and sensitivity of the HEMSTOP questionnaire to predict postpartum bleeding risk are respectively 96% (95% CI, 0.95 to 0.97) and 8% (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.11). CONCLUSION In the conditions of our study, the HEMSTOP questionnaire enables the prediction of a primary haemostatic anomaly with a specificity and sensitivity comparable to routine haemostatic assessments. These findings concur with the recommendation against the routine prescription of laboratory tests for patients lacking a history of bleeding diathesis. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trial NCT 05191251.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3