ISMICS Consensus Conference and Statements of Randomized Controlled Trials of Off-Pump versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Author:

Puskas John D.1,Martin Janet2,Cheng Davy C. H.2,Benussi Stefano3,Bonatti Johannes O.4,Diegeler Anno5,Ferdinand Francis D.6,Kieser Teresa M.7,Lamy André8,Mack Michael J.9,Patel Nirav C.10,Ruel Marc11,Sabik Joseph F.12,Yanagawa Bobby1,Zamvar Vipin13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY USA

2. Centre for Medical Evidence, Decision Integrity, Clinical Impact (MEDICI), Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada

3. Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

4. Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

5. Herz-Und Gefasse Klinik Bad Neustadt, University of Leipzig, Bad Neustadt, Germany

6. Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA USA

7. Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada

8. Division of Cardiac Surgery and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

9. Baylor Health System, Heart Hospital Baylor Plano, Dallas, TX USA

10. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lenox Hill, New York, NY USA

11. University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

12. Heart Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA

13. Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Objective At this consensus conference, we developed evidence-informed consensus statements and recommendations on the practice of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCAB) by systematically reviewing and performing meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing OPCAB and conventional coronary artery bypass (CCAB). Methods All RCTs of OPCAB versus CCAB through April 2013 were screened, and 102 relevant RCTs (19,101 patients) were included in a systematic review and meta-analysis (15 RCTs of 9551 high-risk patients; and 87 RCTs of 9550 low-risk patients) in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology. Consensus statements for the risks and benefits of OPCAB surgery in mortality, morbidity, and resource use were developed based on best available evidence. Results Compared to CCAB, it is reasonable to perform OPCAB to reduce risks of stroke [class IIa, level of evidence (LOE) A], renal dysfunction/failure (class IIa, LOE A), blood transfusion (class I, LOE A), respiratory failure (class I, LOE A), atrial fibrillation (class I, LOE A), wound infection (class I, LOE A), ventilation time, and ICU and hospital length of stay (class I, LOE A). However, OPCAB may be associated with a reduced number of grafts performed (class I, LOE A) and with diminished graft patency (class IIa, LOE A, with increased coronary reintervention at 1 year and beyond (class IIa, LOE A), as well as increased mortality at a median follow-up of 5 years (class IIb, LOE A). Conclusions OPCAB compared with CCAB may improve outcomes in the short-term (stroke, renal dysfunction, blood transfusion, respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation, wound infection, ventilation time, and length of stay). However, over the longer-term, OPCAB may be associated with reduced graft patency, and increased risk of cardiac re-intervention and death.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3