Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting during Acute Coronary Syndrome: Outcomes and Comparison of Off-Pump to Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting at a Veteran Affairs Hospital

Author:

Emerson Dominic A.12,Hynes Conor F.2,Greenberg Michael D.1,Trachiotis Gregory D.13

Affiliation:

1. Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC USA.

2. Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC USA.

3. The George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC USA.

Abstract

Objective The management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has evolved dramatically over the last 50 years. Currently, management includes a multidisciplinary approach potentially including catheter-based therapy, surgery, or purely medical management. Where surgical therapy is indicated, data regarding long-term outcomes are limited. In particular, little data exist regarding on-pump (conventional coronary artery bypass grafting, cCABG) versus off-pump (OPCABG) outcomes for this group. Methods A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was undertaken. Patients undergoing isolated CABG from January 2000 to December 2011 with ACS were identified (n = 271); non-ACS patients (n = 854) were established as a control. Data were analyzed with a χ2 or a t test, where appropriate. Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards model. Results Thirty-day mortality between the ACS and the control groups was similar; however, long-term mortality was worse for the ACS group ( P = 0.032; median follow-up, 5.5 years). Length of stay and composite morbidity were higher in the ACS group ( P < 0.01). Subgroup analysis of ACS patients (OPCABG vs cCABG) demonstrated worse preoperative comorbidities in the OPCABG group, but similar 30-day and long-term mortality. However, the cCABG group had higher rates of reoperation ( P = 0.034) and longer length of stay ( P = 0.017) and operative time ( P < 0.0001). Cox proportional hazards model was applied. Risk factors for the non-ACS cohort included age, diabetes, OPCABG, and ACS ( P < 0.05). Among the ACS cohort, only age remained a statistically significant factor ( P < 0.0001). Conclusions ACS appears to negatively impact long-term, but not short-term, mortality. Within the ACS group, OPCABG compares favorably to cCABG in the long-term and also improves short-term morbidity.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3