Pain assessment and management among adult patients in a gynecology ward: a best practice implementation project

Author:

Bernués-Caudillo Leticia1,Albornos-Muñoz Laura123,Rodrigo M. Paz Fernández4,García Marta Álvarez4,Benito Marta De Rioja4,Serrano María Jesús Ruano4,Navarro Paloma García4,Pérez Patricia Ledesma4,Sotelo Sonia González4,Moreno-Casbas M. Teresa125,Vrbová Tereza67,Klugar Miloslav67,Klugarová Jitka67,Gonzalez-María Esther125

Affiliation:

1. Spanish Centre for Evidence-Based Nursing and Healthcare: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

2. Nursing and Healthcare Research Unit (Investén-isciii), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

3. Research Network on Chronicity, Primary Care and Health Prevention and Promotion (RICAPPS), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

4. Gynecology Ward, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain

5. Biomedical Research Network Centre (CIBER) on Frailty and Healthy Ageing (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

6. Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech Republic: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Czech GRADE Network, Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic

7. Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: This project aimed to improve compliance with evidence-based practice in pain assessment and management in a gynecology ward. Introduction: Effective pain control is important to prevent the negative consequences of pain that is poorly managed. However, it remains undervalued and inadequately treated. Applying evidence-based practices to correctly evaluate and manage pain is essential to improve pain relief. Methods: This project followed the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. A baseline audit of 41 women admitted to the gynecology ward was conducted and measured against 5 best practice criteria, along with a patient satisfaction questionnaire. Targeted strategies were then implemented and a follow-up audit was conducted using the same criteria, methods, and sample size as the baseline audit. Results: The baseline audit revealed gaps between current and best practice. Barriers to implementation were identified and strategies to resolve the barriers were designed and implemented (nurse education, informative materials, electronic patient records system improvements). Comprehensive pain assessment, including dynamic and static pain assessment, use of a validated tool, and education provided to patients and carers, improved in the follow-up audit. There was no change in patient satisfaction levels; however, the discrepancy between pain measured by nurses and pain measured by patients was reduced. Conclusions: The JBI methodology was useful in improving compliance with evidence-based practice criteria. It also facilitated adaptation to new barriers, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Improving nurses’ knowledge of pain assessment can lead to more accurate assessment. Inadequate records systems also made it difficult to record the care that was provided. Subsequent audits will assess sustainability and the project will be escalated to other wards.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference15 articles.

1. An examination of the prevalence of acute pain for hospitalised adult patients: a systematic review;Gregory;J Clin Nurs,2016

2. Assessment before and after the “pain-free hospital”;López Soriano;Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim,2007

3. Nurse-led educational interventions on cancer pain outcomes for oncology outpatients: a systematic review;Zhou;Int Nurs Rev,2015

4. Revisiting the pain resource nurse role in sustaining evidence-based practice changes for pain assessment and management;Allen;Worldviews Evid Based Nurs,2018

5. Use of research by nursing professionals working in hospitals of the Madrid health service [doctoral dissertation];Escobar Aguilar;Universidad de Alicante;,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3