Introducing multidisciplinary ward rounds in Malawi: a best practice implementation project

Author:

Johnson Beverley1,Bennett Clare2,Carrier Judith2,Watkins Dianne1,Mula Chimwemwe3,Kazidule Raphael3,Salley Pricilla4,Klugar Miloslav5,Klugarova Jitka5

Affiliation:

1. School of Healthcare Science, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK

2. Wales Centre for Evidence Based Care: A JBI Centre of Excellence, School of Healthcare Science, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK

3. Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi

4. Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi

5. The Czech Republic (Middle European) Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) and the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) in the United Kingdom advocate the use of structured multidisciplinary team (MDT) ward rounds since they can enable safe, effective, improved care and enhanced staff satisfaction. Objectives: This project sought to implement best practices for MDT ward rounds in a male medical ward in a hospital in Malawi. Methods: The project was conducted in line with the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. A baseline audit of MDT ward rounds was conducted with six staff members. Audit criteria consisted of ten best practices, as recommended by JBI, the RCP, and the RCN. Stakeholder meetings were held to review the baseline audit results and highlight areas of non-compliance. JBI's Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) tool was used to identify barriers to compliance with best practices, and a follow-up audit was conducted to determine changes in practice. Results: The results only showed improvement for one criterion, which rose from 33% to 100% (n=6) where nurses attended the ward round. Conclusions: This study demonstrated some challenges in evidence implementation projects and how these can, in part, be overcome. While the results only demonstrated improvement for one criterion, this paper shows how audits can be used to promote best practice, which in this case resulted in nurses being more involved in ward rounds, improvements in MDT communication, enhanced nurse inclusion in decision-making and, consequently, patient care. Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A233

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3