Evaluating cancer rehabilitation services: Insight from Australia and New Zealand

Author:

Song Krystal123,Jena Swatee45,Alexander Tara6,Lee Su Yi7,Amatya Bhasker1238,Faux Steven G.910,Khan Fary1238

Affiliation:

1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH), Victoria, Australia

2. Department of Medicine (RMH), University of Melbourne, Australia

3. Australian Rehabilitation Research Centre, RMH, Victoria, Australia

4. Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia

5. Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

6. Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia

7. Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation New Zealand Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand

8. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia

9. St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia

10. University of New South Wales, Australia

Abstract

Background: Despite evidence supporting the benefits of rehabilitation for cancer survivors, the nature of cancer rehabilitation programs is inadequately described in Australia and New Zealand. This study provides insight into current service delivery and challenges for health care systems in implementation of cancer rehabilitation programs. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of directors of public and private rehabilitation services in hospital and ambulatory settings across Australia and New Zealand using the Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre (AROC) registry evaluated the current delivery of cancer rehabilitation programs, health professional workforce, core care components delivered, barriers and facilitators to service delivery, and unit/organisation-wide cancer rehabilitation activities. Descriptive statistics analyzed quantitative data, and qualitative analyses interpreted item responses. Results: Of the 300 services, 102 (34%) participants completed the survey. Most services provide nondedicated cancer rehabilitation programs (n=63), led by rehabilitation physicians, followed by allied health. The common tumor streams referred included central nervous system (67%, n=56), haematological (59%, n=49), prostate (58%, n=48), and lung cancers (58%, n=48). Patients were frequently referred during post-treatment phase (87%, n=72) and treatment phases (66%, n=55). Core program components were multimodal exercises, fatigue management strategies, and management of medical complications and medications. The main barriers and facilitators toward the uptake of cancer rehabilitation programs were identified. Key activities in education, research, advocacy, and clinical practice improvement were also highlighted. Conclusions: The survey identified key barriers and facilitators for the implementation of cancer rehabilitation programs. Collaborative efforts of relevant stakeholders, clinicians, consumers, and policymakers need to address barriers to broader implementation of cancer rehabilitation services.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3