National Legislative Favorability and Insurance Coverage for Adult and Adolescent Gender-Affirming Surgery

Abstract

Background: Despite established medical necessity, laws prohibiting coverage discrimination, and increasing numbers of transgender and gender diverse patients seeking gender-affirming surgeries (GAS), cost and restrictive insurance policies continue to be the most common barriers. As recent legislation places further restrictions on GAS, this study aims to provide an updated review of insurance policies and assess the relationship between legislative favorability and coverage. Methods: Insurance policies of groups representing 80% market coverage in each state were collected for gender-affirming chest, genital and facial surgery. Policies were categorized based on previously published methodologies: never-covered (N), case-by-case (CC), and preauthorization (PA). The relationship between established scores of legislative favorability and policy coverage in each state was analyzed and compared across regions. Results: Of the 316 analyzed policies, coverage was preauthorized most often for genital (94.0%), masculinizing top (93%), feminizing top (74%), and facial reconstruction (24%), respectively. Higher legislative scores in the Northeast and West, as well as individual states were predictive of increased genital, facial, and all forms of adolescent GAS, but were not correlated to chest GAS. Conclusion: Compared to previous studies, our findings suggest that there is a growing acceptance of GAS as medically necessary. However, the correlation between legislative scores and genital, face, and adolescent GAS coverage may suggest increased reliance on sociopolitical factors for access in the absence of comprehensive medical guidelines, which are more established for chest reconstruction. Significantly higher coverage of masculinizing versus feminizing chest surgery suggests additional burden of proof for GAS with a cosmetic overlap.