The Impact of Unexpected Billing in Spine Surgery and How the Price Calculator Can Improve Patient Care

Author:

Meade Matthew1,Issa Tariq Z.23,Lee Yunsoo3,Lambrechts Mark J.34,Charlton Alexander3,Radack Tyler3,Kalra Andrew3,Mangan John3,Canseco Jose A.3,Kurd Mark F.3,Woods Barrett I.3,Kaye I. David3,Hilibrand Alan S.3,Vaccaro Alexander R.3,Schroeder Gregory D.3,Kepler Christopher K.3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jefferson Washington Township Hospital, Sewell, NJ

2. Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL

3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA

4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

Abstract

Study Design: Survey study. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the impact of unexpected in-network billing on the patient experience after spinal surgery. Summary of Background Data: The average American household faces difficulty paying unexpected medical bills. Although legislative efforts have targeted price transparency and rising costs, elective surgical costs continue to rise significantly. Patients are therefore sometimes still responsible for unexpected medical costs, the impact of which is unknown in spine surgery. Methods: Patients who underwent elective spine surgery patients from January 2021 to January 2022 at a single institution were surveyed regarding their experience with the billing process. Demographic characteristics associated with unexpected billing situations, patient satisfaction, and financial distress, along with utilization and evaluation of the online price estimator, were collected. Results: Of 818 survey participants, 183 (22.4%) received an unexpected in-network bill, and these patients were younger (56.7 vs. 63.4 y, P<0.001). Patients who received an unexpected bill were more likely to feel uninformed about billing (41.2% vs. 21.7%, P<0.001) and to report that billing impacted surgical satisfaction (53.8% vs. 19.1%, P<0.001). However, both groups reported similar satisfaction postoperatively (Likert >3/5: 86.0% vs. 85.5%, P=0.856). Only 35 (4.3%) patients knew of the price estimator’s existence. The price estimator was reported to be very easy or easy (N=18, 78.2%) to understand and very accurate (N=6, 35.3%) or somewhat accurate (N=8, 47.1%) in predicting costs. Conclusions: Despite new regulations, a significant portion of patients received unexpected bills leading to financial distress and affecting their surgical experience. Although most patients were unaware of the price estimator, almost all patients who did know of it found it to be easy to use and accurate in cost prediction. Patients may benefit from targeted education efforts, including information on the price estimator to alleviate unexpected financial burden.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3