Customized 3-dimensional–printed Vertebral Implants for Spinal Reconstruction After Tumor Resection

Author:

Hirase Takashi12,Vemu Sree M.1,Boddapati Venkat3,Ling Jeremiah F.2,So Matthew1,Saifi Comron1,Marco Rex A.W.1,Bird Justin E.4

Affiliation:

1. Houston Methodist Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston

2. Texas A&M University Health Science Center College of Medicine, Bryan, TX

3. New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY

4. Department of Orthopedic Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Abstract

Study Design: Systematic review. Objective: To examine the outcomes of customized 3-dimensional (3D) printed implants for spinal reconstruction after tumor resection. Summary of Background Data: Various techniques exist for spinal reconstruction after tumor resection. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the utility of customized 3D-printed implants for spinal reconstruction after tumor resection. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed according to “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses” guidelines. All level I–V evidence studies reporting the use of 3D-printed implants for spinal reconstruction after tumor resection were included. Results: Eleven studies (65 patients; mean age, 40.9 ± 18.1 y) were included. Eleven patients (16.9%) underwent intralesional resections with positive margins and 54 patients (83.1%) underwent en bloc spondylectomy with negative margins. All patients underwent vertebral reconstruction with 3D-printed titanium implants. Tumor involvement was in the cervical spine in 21 patients (32.3%), thoracic spine in 29 patients (44.6%), thoracolumbar junction in 2 patients (3.1%), and lumbar spine in 13 patients (20.0%). Ten studies with 62 patients reported perioperative outcomes radiologic/oncologic status at final follow-up. At the mean final follow-up of 18.5 ± 9.8 months, 47 patients (75.8%) had no evidence of disease, 9 patients (14.5%) were alive with recurrence, and 6 patients (9.7%) had died of disease. One patient who underwent C3–C5 en bloc spondylectomy had an asymptomatic subsidence of 2.7 mm at the final follow-up. Twenty patients that underwent thoracic and/or lumbar reconstruction had a mean subsidence of 3.8 ± 4.7 mm at the final follow-up; however, only 1 patient had a symptomatic subsidence that required revision surgery. Eleven patients (17.7%) had one or more major complications. Conclusion: There is some evidence to suggest that using customized 3D-printed titanium or titanium alloy implants is an effective technique for spinal reconstruction after tumor resection. There is a high incidence of asymptomatic subsidence and major complications that are similar to other methods of reconstruction. Level of Evidence: Level V, systematic review of level I–V studies.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3