The Association Between Sociodemographic Factors, Social Determinants of Health, and Spine Surgical Patient Portal Utilization

Author:

Owolo Edwin1ORCID,Petitt Zoey1,Charles Antoinette1,Baëta César1,Poehlein Emily2,Green Cynthia2,Cook Chad2,Sperber Jacob1,Chandiramani Anisha34,Roman Matthew45,Goodwin C. Rory1,Erickson Melissa6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery

2. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics

3. Division of General Internal Medicine; Department of Medicine

4. Duke Health Technology Solutions

5. Duke Network Services

6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To examine patient portal use among the surgical spine patient population across different sociodemographic groups and assess the impact of patient portal use on clinical outcomes. Summary of Background Data: Patient portals (PP) have been shown to improve outcomes and quality of care. Engaging them requires internet access, technological literacy, and dexterity, which may serve as access barriers. Methods: After exclusion criteria were applied, the study included data for 9211 encounters from 7955 patients. PP utilization was defined as having activated and used the Duke University Medical Center patient portal system, MyChart, at least once. Sociodemographic characteristics included urbanicity, age, race, ethnicity, language, employment, and primary insurer. Clinical outcomes included the length of hospital stay during the procedure, 30-day return to the emergency department, 30-day readmission, and being discharged somewhere other than home. Results: Being older than 65, non-White, unemployed, non–English-speaking, male, not-partnered, uninsured or publicly insured (Medicaid, Medicare and under 65 years of age, or other government insurance), and living in a rural environment were all risk factors for decreased PP utilization among surgical spine patients. A one-risk factor decrease in the number of social risk factors was associated with a 78% increase in the odds of PP utilization [odds ratio (OR): 1.78; 95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.69–1.87; P<0.001]. Patients not utilizing the portal at the time of their procedure had higher odds of 30-day readmission (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.26–2.00), discharge somewhere other than home (OR: 2.41, 95% CI: 1.95–2.99), and an increased length of hospital stay (geometric mean ratio: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.12–1.30) compared with those who utilized it. Conclusions: In patients undergoing spine procedures, PPs are not equally utilized among different sociodemographic groups. PP utilization is also associated with better outcomes. Interventions aimed at increasing PP uptake may improve care for certain patients.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3