The Impact of Physical Therapy After Lumbar Fusion Surgery

Author:

Heard Jeremy C.1,Lee Yunsoo A.1,Lambrechts Mark1,Brush Parker1,Issa Tariq Z.1,Kanhere Arun1,Bodner John2,Purtill Caroline2,Reddy Yashas C.2,Patil Sanath2,Somers Sydney1,D’Antonio Nicholas D.1,Mangan John J.1,Canseco Jose A.1,Woods Barrett R.1,Kaye Ian D.1,Rihn Jeff A.1,Hilibrand Alan S.1,Vaccaro Alexander R.1,Kepler Christopher K.1,Schroeder Gregory D.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA

2. Sydney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective Cohort. Objective: To determine if outcomes varied between patients based on physical therapy (PT) attendance after lumbar fusion surgery. Summary of Background Data: The literature has been mixed regarding the efficacy of postoperative PT to improve disability and back pain, as measured by patient-reported outcome measures. Given the prevalence of PT referrals and lack of high-quality evidence, there is a need for additional studies investigating the efficacy of PT after lumbar fusion surgery to aid in developing robust clinical guidelines. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients receiving lumbar fusion surgery by current procedural terminology codes and separated them into 2 groups based on whether PT was prescribed. Electronic medical records were reviewed for patient and surgical characteristics, PT utilization, and surgical outcomes. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were identified and compared preoperatively, at 90 days postoperatively and one year postoperatively. Results: The two groups had similar patient characteristics and comorbidities and demonstrated no significant differences between readmission, complication, and revision rates after surgery. Patients that attended PT had significantly more fused levels (1.41 ± 0.64 vs. 1.32 ± 0.54, P=0.027), longer operative durations (234 ± 96.4 vs. 215 ± 86.1 min, P=0.012), and longer postoperative hospital stays (3.35 ± 1.68 vs. 3.00 ± 1.49 days, P=0.004). All groups improved similarly by Oswestry Disability Index, short form-12 physical and mental health subsets, and back and leg pain by Visual Analog Scale at 90-day and 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: Our data suggest that physical therapy does not significantly impact PROMs after lumbar fusion surgery. Given the lack of data suggesting clear benefit of PT after lumbar fusion, surgeons should consider more strict criteria when recommending physical therapy to their patients after lumbar fusion surgery. Level of Evidence: Level—Ⅲ

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3