Letter to the Editor: There are Considerable Inconsistencies Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences in TKA: A Systematic Review
Author:
Affiliation:
1. Departments of Physical Therapy, Orthopaedic Surgery and Rheumatology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery
Reference12 articles.
1. Disentangling contextual effects from musculoskeletal treatments;Cashin;Osteoarthritis Cartilage,2021
2. There are considerable inconsistencies among minimum clinically important differences in TKA: a systematic review;Deckey;Clin Orthop Relat Res,2023
3. Model-based pain and function outcome trajectory types for patients undergoing knee arthroplasty: a secondary analysis from a randomized clinical trial;Dumenci;Osteoarthritis Cartilage,2019
4. A confirmatory factor analysis approach was found to accurately estimate the reliability of transition ratings;Griffiths;J Clin Epidemiol,2022
5. The smallest worthwhile effect is superior to the MCID for estimating acceptable benefits of knee arthroplasty;Henderson;J Clin Epidemiol,2022
Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Letter to the Editor: Defining Patient-relevant Thresholds and Change Scores for the HOOS JR and KOOS JR Anchored on the Patient-acceptable Symptom State Question;Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research;2024-04-26
2. Limitations of Minimal Clinically Important Difference Estimates and Potential Alternatives;Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery;2023-12-07
3. Letter to the editor commenting on “Prognostic factors of knee pain and function 12 months after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study of 798 patients”;The Knee;2023-10
4. Reply to the Letter to the Editor: There are Considerable Inconsistencies Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences in TKA: A Systematic Review;Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research;2023-02-24
1.学者识别学者识别
2.学术分析学术分析
3.人才评估人才评估
"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370
www.globalauthorid.com
TOP
Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司 京公网安备11010802033243号 京ICP备18003416号-3