What Are Culturally Relevant Activities of Daily Living in the Asian-Indian Population? A Survey of 402 Patients With Knee Pain

Abstract

Abstract Background Patient-reported outcome measures are essential tools in assessing clinical outcomes. Although several patient-reported outcome measures such as the Oxford Knee Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score have been developed and validated, their applicability in the Asian-Indian population may be limited; key cultural differences including varying functional demands, ethnicity-specific necessities, and social expectations represent a unique collection of needs. Such differences include preferences toward ground-level activities and those favoring the manual completion of tasks. Questions/purposes (1) Which activities of daily living (ADLs) do patients in an Asian-Indian population consider the most important? (2) How do the categories of ADLs (personal care, household, work, travel, and recreation) vary among patients of different gender (men and women) and age (< 60 and > 60 years) groups? Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in October 2019 at a hospital in Mumbai, India. We developed a questionnaire with five domains for physical activity (personal care, household, work, travel, and recreation) formulated from a review and modification of existing categories identified by the WHO and the American Heart Association. Forty key ADLs were identified according to input obtained from detailed interviews of healthcare providers involved in the care of patients with orthopaedic illness, based on established domains. Respondents were instructed to identify the ADLs that were the most relevant to their lifestyle and culture. Responses from 402 patients (mean age 60 ± 12 years; 51% [206 of 402] were women) were analyzed to identify the most commonly selected ADLs. Responses were further evaluated to understand the impact of gender and age on these preferences by comparing men and women, as well as younger (age < 60 years) and older (age > 60 years) patients. Results The three most frequently reported ADLs in each domain, representing the ADLs that were the most important to the Asian-Indian population, were standing without assistance (82% [331 of 402]), getting up with support (81% [324 of 402]), and toilet use (74% [298 of 402]) in the personal activity category; climbing stairs (80% [322 of 402]), sitting cross-legged (80% [320 of 402]), and praying (79% [319 of 402]) in the household activity category; going to the market (72% [291 of 402]), long-distance walking (62% [250 of 402]), and carrying a shopping bag (60% [242 of 402]) in the work activity category; walking on an uneven surface (66% [266 of 402]), using a taxi (61% [247 of 402]), and traveling by train (59% [239 of 402]) in the travel activity category; and yoga (67% [269 of 402]), playing with children (66% [264 of 402]), and indoor games (63% [252 of 402]) in the recreational activity category. The order of importance of ADL domains was identical in the men versus women groups as well as in the younger age versus older age groups; ADL domains with the highest number of selected ADLs in order of decreasing importance were household care, personal care, work, travel, and recreation when analyzed by individual gender and age groups. Women were more likely than men to report the following ADLs as being important: climbing stairs (84% [172 of 206] of women and 77% [150 of 196] of men), getting up without support (83% [171 of 206] of women and 78% [153 of 196] of men), going to the market (74% [152 of 206] of women and 71% [139 of 196] of men), walking on uneven surfaces (67% [139 of 206] of women and 65% [127 of 196] of men), and playing with children (72% [148 of 206] of women and 59% [116 of 196] of men). Conclusion The findings of this study aim to help providers engage in personalized and socioculturally relevant discussions about knee arthritis. Highlighted areas of importance may facilitate a more comprehensive preoperative discussion of total joint arthroplasty expectations in the context of the needs and demands of Asian-Indian patients. The findings of this study could establish the groundwork for the development of ethnicity-specific patient-reported outcome measures by incorporating the identified ADLs in novel metrics with validation of face and content validity. Level of Evidence Level III, prognostic study.