Agreement and Consistency of Absolute and Relative Corticospinal Stimulus–Response Curves for Upper, Lower, and Axial Musculature in Healthy Adults

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the agreement and consistency of absolute and relative stimulus–response curve (SRC) parameter estimates for upper extremity, lower extremity, and axial muscles. Methods: Thirty (15 W, age: 27.0 ± 6.3 y, height: 171.9 ± 8.9 cm, weight: 80.2 ± 19.3 kg) healthy adults completed absolute (5% to 100% stimulator output) and relative (65% to 160% motor threshold) SRCs of the first dorsal interosseous, vastus lateralis, and rectus abdominis during submaximal isometric contractions. Mean motor-evoked potential amplitudes were fit with nonlinear regression to derive MEPmax, V50, and slope. Absolute agreement and consistency were assessed with ICCs, Cronbachs alphas, and Bland–Altman plots. Independent t-tests were used to examine differences in motor threshold, physical activity, strength, and muscle activity among participants with valid and invalid SRC parameters. Results: Absolute and relative SRCs displayed good agreement and consistency for MEPmax and V50 but not slope. Motor thresholds were lower among participants with valid absolute SRCs for the rectus abdominis and vastus lateralis. Motor threshold, physical activity, strength, and muscle activity did not differ among those with valid and invalid parameters for all relative SRCs and absolute SRCs for the first dorsal interosseous. Conclusions: Absolute and relative SRCs produce similar MEPmax and V50 estimates in the first dorsal interosseous, vastus lateralis, and rectus abdominis. The validity of absolute and relative SRC results may differ depending on individual characteristics and tested muscles.