Neurophysiological and Clinical Outcomes in Episodic Migraine Without Aura: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author:

Deodato Manuela123,Granato Antonio3,Martini Miriam23,Buoite Stella Alex2ORCID,Galmonte Alessandra2,Murena Luigi23,Manganotti Paolo23

Affiliation:

1. Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy;

2. Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy; and

3. Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, Trieste, Italy.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess differences between people with episodic migraine and healthy controls in some neurophysiological and clinical outcomes, which, in turn, may highlight the differences in sensory processing, especially in cortical excitability, pain processing, and executive function. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed, including the following outcomes: pressure pain thresholds with algometry; resting motor threshold, short-interval intracortical inhibition, and intracortical facilitation with transcranial magnetic stimulation; and executive functions with the trail making test and the frontal assessment battery. Results: Thirty adults with migraine (36 ± 10 years) and 30 healthy controls (29 ± 14 years) were included in this study. Compared with the healthy controls, participants with migraine presented lower pressure pain thresholds values in all the assessed muscles (P < 0.001), lower resting motor threshold (−10.5% of the stimulator output, 95% CI: −16.8 to −4.2, P = 0.001, Cohen d = 0.869) and higher short-interval intracortical inhibition motor-evoked potential's amplitude at 3 ms (0.25, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.46, P = 0.015, Cohen d = 0.662), and worse performances both in trail making test (7.1, 95% CI: 0.9 to 13.4, P = 0.027, Cohen d = 0.594) and frontal assessment battery (−1.1, 95% CI: −1.7 to −0.5, P = 0.001, Cohen d = 0.915). Conclusions: Participants with migraine presented significant differences in cortical excitability, executive functions, and pressure pain thresholds, compared with healthy controls.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Neurology (clinical),Neurology,Physiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3