Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence to Aid Decision-Making in Kidney Allocation

Author:

Ali Hatem1ORCID,Mohamed Mahmoud2,Molnar Miklos Z.3,Fülöp Tibor45,Burke Bernard6,Shroff Arun7,Shroff Sunil7,Briggs David89,Krishnan Nithya16

Affiliation:

1. University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire, United Kingdom

2. University Hospitals of Mississippi

3. Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

4. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Medical University Hospitals of South Carolina

5. Medicine Service, Ralph H Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina

6. Research Centre for Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom

7. Xtend.AI, Medindia.net, MOHAN Foundation

8. Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics NHS Blood and Transplant, Birmingham, United Kingdom

9. Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Abstract

In kidney transplantation, pairing recipients with the highest longevity with low-risk allografts to optimize graft-donor survival is a complex challenge. Current risk prediction models exhibit limited discriminative and calibration capabilities and have not been compared to modern decision-assisting tools. We aimed to develop a highly accurate risk-stratification index using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. Using data from the UNOS database (156,749 deceased kidney transplants, 2007–2021), we randomly divided transplants into training (80%) and validation (20%) sets. The primary measure was death-censored graft survival. Four machine learning models were assessed for calibration (integrated Brier score [IBS]) and discrimination (time-dependent concordance [CTD] index), compared with existing models. We conducted decision curve analysis and external validation using UK Transplant data. The Deep Cox mixture model showed the best discriminative performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.66, 0.67, and 0.68 at 6, 9, and 12 years post-transplant), with CTD at 0.66. Calibration was adequate (IBS = 0.12), while the kidney donor profile index (KDPI) model had lower CTD (0.59) and AUC (0.60). AI-based D-TOP outperformed the KDPI in evaluating transplant pairs based on graft survival, potentially enhancing deceased donor selection. Advanced computing is poised to influence kidney allocation schemes.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference26 articles.

1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of renal replacement therapy in Austria.;Haller;Nephrol Dial Transplant,2011

2. Impact of kidney transplantation on functional status.;Ali;Ann Med,2021

3. Using information available at the time of donor offer to predict kidney transplant survival outcomes: A systematic review of prediction models.;Riley;Transpl Int,1039

4. Risk prediction models for graft failure in kidney transplantation: A systematic review.;Kaboré;Nephrol Dial Transplant,2017

5. A comprehensive risk quantification score for deceased donor kidneys: The kidney donor risk index.;Rao;Transplantation,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3