Affiliation:
1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
2. Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare the estimates of pump flow and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) derived from a mathematical regression model to those from an artificial deep neural network (ADNN). Hemodynamic and pump-related data were generated using both the Cleveland Clinic continuous-flow total artificial heart (CFTAH) and pediatric CFTAH on a mock circulatory loop. An ADNN was trained with generated data, and a mathematical regression model was also generated using the same data. Finally, the absolute error for the actual measured data and each set of estimated data were compared. A strong correlation was observed between the measured flow and the estimated flow using either method (mathematical, R = 0.97, p < 0.01; ADNN, R = 0.99, p < 0.01). The absolute error was smaller in the ADNN estimation (mathematical, 0.3 L/min; ADNN 0.12 L/min; p < 0.01). Furthermore, strong correlation was observed between measured and estimated SVR (mathematical, R = 0.97, p < 0.01; ADNN, R = 0.99, p < 0.01). The absolute error for ADNN estimation was also smaller than that of the mathematical estimation (mathematical, 463 dynes·sec·cm−5; ADNN, 123 dynes·sec·cm−5, p < 0.01). Therefore, in this study, ADNN estimation was more accurate than mathematical regression estimation.
http://links.lww.com/ASAIO/A991
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Biomedical Engineering,General Medicine,Biomaterials,Bioengineering,Biophysics