Multicenter Study of Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Aortic Valve Replacement

Abstract

There is controversy regarding appropriate surgical ablation procedures concomitant with nonmitral valve surgery. We retrospectively investigated the impact of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation during aortic valve replacement between 2010 and 2015 in 16 institutions registered through the Japanese Society for Arrhythmia Surgery. Clinical data of 171 patients with paroxysmal and nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing aortic valve replacement were collected and classified into full maze operation (n = 79), pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) (n = 56), and no surgical ablation (n = 36) groups. All patients were followed up and electrocardiograms were recorded in 68% at 2 years. The myocardial ischemia time was significantly longer in the maze group than the others during isolated aortic valve replacement (p ≤ 0.01), but there were no significant differences in 30-day or 2-year mortality rates between groups. The ratios of sinus rhythm at 2 years in paroxysmal and nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation in the maze group versus PVI group were 87% versus 97%, respectively (p = 0.24) and 53% versus 42%, respectively (p = 0.47). No patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation in the no surgical ablation group maintained sinus rhythm at 2 years. In conclusion, both maze and PVI during aortic valve replacement are valuable strategies to restore sinus rhythm at 2 years and result in favorable early and midterm survival rates.