Estimation of Cardiac Output Under Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Comparing Thermodilution Methods to 3D Echocardiography

Abstract

Thermodilution methods to determine cardiac output (CO) may be affected by veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We compared CO estimations by pulmonary arterial thermodilution using a pulmonary arterial catheter (COPAC), transpulmonary thermodilution (COTPTD), and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DEcho) (CO3DEcho) in 18 patients under veno-venous ECMO. Comparisons between CO3DEcho and COPAC, and COTPTD were performed using correlation statistics and Bland–Altman analysis. Blood flow on ECMO support ranged from 4.3 to 5.8 L/min (median 4.9 L/min). Cardiac output measured with three-dimensional echocardiography was 5.2 L/min (3.8/5.9), COPAC was 7.3 L/min (5.9/7.9), and COTPTD was 7.3 L/min (6/8.2) (median [25%/75% percentile]). Bland–Altman analysis of CO3DEcho and COPAC revealed a mean bias of −2.06 L/min, with limits of agreement from −4.16 to 0.04 L/min. Bland–Altman analysis of CO3DEcho and COTPTD revealed a mean bias of −2.22 L/min, with limits of agreement from −4.18 to −0.25 L/min. We found a negative mean bias and negative limits of agreement between CO3DEcho and COPAC/COTPTD. We concluded an influence on the estimation of CO by thermodilution under ECMO most likely due to loss of indicator resulting in an overestimation of CO. Clinicians should consider this when monitoring thermodilution-based CO under ECMO.