Factors Influencing the Accuracy of Sonography-estimated Fetal Weight: A Retrospective Cohort Study in the Chinese Population

Author:

Sun Fang-Can1,Wang Hai-Hong12,Zhang Jing-Jing1,Gu Xin-Xian3,Hu Ting4,Wang Ming-Yue4,Zhu Yin-Di4,Chen You-Guo1,Han Bing1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221006, China

3. Department of Ultrasound, Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of sonography-estimated fetal weight (EFW) and to determine the potential factors influencing EFW accuracy in the Chinese population. Methods: Eleven widely used formulae were chosen to evaluate the accuracy of EFW in 7016 cases in a retrospective cohort study. Nine potential factors (prenatal body mass index [BMI], gestational age [GA], birth weight [BW], fetal sex, fetal presentation, amniotic fluid volume [AFV], seniority of sonographers, the time interval between ultrasonic measurement and delivery, and diabetes mellitus) were analyzed by binary logistic regression to determine whether they influenced sonography-EFW. Results: All 11 models had high correlation coefficients between EFW and BW (r = 0.819–0.843). Model 3 was the most accurate formula for the Chinese population. Compared to fetuses with EFW of 2500–3999 g, the accuracy of EFW decreased by 69.10% (P <0.001) for fetuses less than 2500 g, and decreased by 54.10% (P <0.001) for fetuses larger than 4000 g. The accuracy of EFW in female fetuses decreased by 12.70% compared with male fetuses (P = 0.021). Compared to the EFW calculated 1-3 days before delivery, the accuracy of the EFW performed 4–7 days before delivery showed a significant decrease (P = 0.014). The accuracy of EFW was influenced by the individual measurement accuracy of the sonographers. Maternal BMI, DM, GA, fetal presentation, and AFV did not influence the accuracy of EFW after adjustment. Conclusion: Model 3 was the most accurate model for the Chinese population. The BW, fetal sex, time interval, and technique of the sonographers had different influences on the accuracy of EFW.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Reproductive Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3