Effects of ovarian response prediction index and follicle-oocyte index on pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study of 12,218 fresh transfer cycles

Author:

Wang Mao1,Tan Li2,Ding Yu-Bin34,Tang Xiao-Jun13,Li Tian5,Hu Xin-Yue1,Zhong Hu-Cen1,Wan Qi26,Zhong Zhao-Hui1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Research Center for Medicine and Social Development, Innovation Center for Social Risk Governance in Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China

2. The Reproductive Center, Chengdu Xinan Gynecology Hospital, Chengdu 610011, China

3. Joint International Research Laboratory of Reproduction and Development of the Ministry of Education of China, School of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China

4. Academician Workstation, Department of Pharmacology, Changsha Medical University, Changsha 410219, China

5. The Department of Reproductive Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China

6. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the potential relationships among the ovarian response prediction index (ORPI), follicle-oocyte index (FOI), and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) in women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) fresh cycle transfer. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included 12,218 women who underwent their first IVF/ICSI-ET cycle between December 2014 and January 2021. The primary and secondary outcomes of our study were CPR and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), respectively. The data were divided into three groups according to the ORPI and FOI tertiles. Multivariate logistic regression analyses, stratification analyses, interaction, restricted cubic splines, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to identify the relationships among ORPI, FOI, and CPR. Results: A statistically significant increase in CPR was detected from the lowest to the highest tertile group (ORPI: 48.12%, 54.07%, and 53.47%, P <0.001; FOI: 49.99%, 52.95%, and 52.71%, P = 0.012). A higher CLBR was observed in the high group (ORPI: 38.63%, 44.62%, and 44.19%, P <0.001; FOI: 41.02%, 43.78%, and 42.59%, P = 0.039). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between ORPI, FOI, and neither CPR (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}], 0.99 [0.97–1.00] vs. [1.02 {0.84–1.24}]) nor CLBR (OR [95% CI], 0.99 [0.97–1.01] vs. 0.99 [0.81–1.20]). No significant association was found among FOI, ORPI, and CPR, even in the subgroups. Restricted cubic spline analyses indicated the existence of a non-linear relationship across the entire range of FOI and ORPI. The ORPI and FOI variables had poor predictive ability (AUC < 0.60) for CPR. Conclusions: Both ORPI and FOI are not reliable predictors of clinical pregnancy or live birth outcomes in fresh ETs. Clinicians and researchers should avoid using FOI and ORPI to assess pregnancy outcomes after fresh ET because of their limited relevance and predictive value.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3