Performance of a novel artificial intelligence software developed to derive coronary fractional flow reserve values from diagnostic angiograms

Author:

Ben-Assa Eyal12,Abu Salman Amjad3,Cafri Carlos3,Roguin Ariel4,Hellou Elias4,Koifman Edward5,Feld Yair6,Lev Eli1,Sheinman Guy1,Harari Emanuel1,Abu Dogosh Ala3,Beyar Rafael6,Garcia-Garcia Hector M.7,Davies Justine8,Ben-Yehuda Ori9

Affiliation:

1. Cardiology Division, Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Ashdod, Israel

2. Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

3. Cardiology Division, Soroka Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva

4. Department of Cardiology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa

5. Department of Cardiology, Meir Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Kfar Saba

6. Department of Cardiology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

7. Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington DC, USA

8. International Centre for Circulatory Health, Imperial College, NHS Trust, London, UK

9. Sulpizio Cardiovascular Institute, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA

Abstract

Background Although invasive measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) is recommended to guide revascularization, its routine use is underutilized. Recently, a novel non-invasive software that can instantaneously produce FFR values from the diagnostic angiograms, derived completely from artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms has been developed. We aim to assess the accuracy and diagnostic performance of AI-FFR in a real-world retrospective study. Methods Retrospective, three-center study comparing AI-FFR values with invasive pressure wire–derived FFR obtained in patients undergoing routine diagnostic angiography. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of AI-FFR were analyzed. Results A total of 304 vessels from 297 patients were included. Mean invasive FFR was 0.86 vs. 0.85 AI-FFR (mean difference: −0.005, P = 0.159). The diagnostic performance of AI-FFR demonstrated sensitivity of 91%, specificity 95%, positive predictive value 83% and negative predictive value 97%. Overall accuracy was 94% and the area under curve was 0.93 (95% CI 0.88–0.97). 105 lesions fell around the cutoff value (FFR = 0.75–0.85); in this sub-group, AI-FFR demonstrated sensitivity of 95%, and specificity 94%, with an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI 88.2–98.0). AI-FFR calculation time was 37.5 ± 7.4 s for each angiographic video. In 89% of cases, the software located the target lesion and in 11%, the operator manually marked the target lesion. Conclusion AI-FFR calculated by an AI-based, angio-derived method, demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance against invasive FFR. AI-FFR calculation was fast with high reproducibility.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3