Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability of the HEART Score Calculated by Ambulance Nurses Versus Emergency Physicians

Author:

van der Waarden Nancy W. P. L.ORCID,de Wolf G. Sander,van Meerten Kirsten F.,Backus Barbra E.

Abstract

Chest pain is a common complaint for consultation of emergency medical services worldwide. Currently, ambulance nurses (AN) base their decision to transport a patient to the hospital on their own professional experience. The HEART score could improve prehospital risk stratification and patient treatment. The aim of this study is to investigate the interrater reliability and predictive accuracy of the HEART score between AN and emergency physicians (EP). A retrospective analysis on data of 569 patients 18 years and older included in two prehospital HEART score studies. The endpoints are interrater reliability (intraclass correlation [ICC]) and predictive accuracy for major adverse cardiac events within 30 days of the HEART score calculated by AN versus EP. Predictive accuracy is sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value (PPV) and negative predicted value (NPV). Interrater reliability was good for total HEART score (ICC 0.78; 95% CI 0.75–0.81). However, focusing on the decision to transport a patient, the ICC dropped to 0.62 (95% CI 0.62–0.70). History and Risk factors caused the most variability. Predictive accuracy of HEART differed between AN and EP. The HEART score calculated by AN was sensitivity 91%, specificity 38%, PPV 26%, and NPV 95%. The HEART score calculated by EP was sensitivity 98%, specificity 32%, PPV −26%, and NPV 99%. With a cut-off value of 0–2 for a low HEART score, predictive accuracy significantly improved for the HEART score calculated by AN: sensitivity 98%, specificity 18%, PPV 22%, and NPV 98%. Our study shows a moderate interrater reliability and lower predictive accuracy of a HEART score calculated by AN versus EP. AN underestimate the risk of patients with acute chest pain, with the largest discrepancies in the elements History and Risk factors. Reconsidering the cut-off values of the low-risk HEART category, as well as a carefully developed training program, will possibly lead to a higher interrater reliability of the HEART score and higher predictive accuracy used by AN.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Emergency Nursing,Emergency Medicine

Reference18 articles.

1. A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department;Backus;International Journal of Cardiology,2013

2. Chest pain in the emergency room: A multicenter validation of the HEART score;Backus;Critical Pathways in Cardiology,2010

3. Can emergency physicians “rule in” and “rule out” acute myocardial infarction with clinical judgement?;Body;Emergency Medicine Journal,2014

4. “Chest pain typicality” in suspected acute coronary syndromes and the impact of clinical experience;Carlton;The American Journal of Medicine,2015

5. Fast assessment and management of chest pain patients without ST-elevation in the pre-hospital gateway (FamouS Triage): Ruling out a myocardial infarction at home with the modified HEART score;Ishak;European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3