Lived experience of psychosis: challenges and perspectives for research and care

Author:

Sibeoni Jordan12

Affiliation:

1. Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie de l’Adolescent, Argenteuil Hospital Centre, Argenteuil Cedex

2. ECSTRRA Team, UMR-1153, Inserm, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France

Abstract

Purpose of review There is currently a recognition of the first-personal knowledge of people with lived experience of schizophrenia as an epistemic privilege that can influence and improve the quality of research and care. This review aims to identify and better understand the actual challenges and perspectives of this field. Recent findings Two main themes are present in the recent literature: first, the direct involvement of persons with lived experience of psychosis both in research (first person accounts, lived experience and participatory research) and care with the development of new professional positions such as expert patients and peer workers; second, the field of research on lived experience of psychosis based mostly on phenomenological psychiatry and qualitative research. Summary Both involvement of persons with lived experience in care and research, and research on lived experience of psychosis have direct impact and outcomes such as leading to a better understanding of psychotic phenomena and to reduced stigma and providing more person-centered and holistic care and better social support. This review also highlights the conceptual and ethical challenges to overcome, especially the risk of tokenism.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference41 articles.

1. Experiential knowledge: a new concept for the analysis of self-help groups;Borkman;Soc Serv Rev,1976

2. Epistemic injustice in psychiatric practice: epistemic duties and the phenomenological approach;Drożdżowicz;J Med Ethics,2021

3. What is life after psychosis like? Stories of three individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia;Lee;J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs,2021

4. Beyond recovery: exploring growth in the aftermath of psychosis;Lee;Front Psychiatry,2020

5. My strategies for dealing with radical psychotic doubt: a Schizo-something philosopher's tale;Jeppsson;Schizophr Bull,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3