Author:
Ross Erin E.,Ourshalimian Shadassa,Spurrier Ryan G.,Chaudhari Pradip P.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Cervical spine (c-spine) evaluation is a critical component in trauma evaluation, and although several pediatric c-spine evaluation algorithms have been developed, none have been widely implemented. Here, we assess rates of c-spine imaging use across children's hospitals, specifically temporal trends in imaging use, variation across hospitals in imaging used, and timing of magnetic resonance imaging in admitted patients.
METHODS
Data from the Children's Hospital Associations Pediatric Health Information System were abstracted from 2015 to 2020. Patients younger than 18 years seen in the emergency department with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, code indicative of trauma and c-spine plain radiograph or computed tomography (CT) in the emergency department were included. Data visualization and descriptive statistics were used to assess rates of imaging use by age, year, hospital, injury severity, and day of service. Changes in rates of imaging use over time were evaluated via simple linear regression.
RESULTS
Across 25,238 patient encounters at 35 children's hospitals, there was an increase in use of c-spine CT from 2015 to 2020 (28.5–36.5%). There was substantial interinstitutional variation in rates of use of plain radiographs versus CT for initial evaluation of the c-spine across all age groups. Magnetic resonance imaging was obtained more than 3 days after admission in 31.5% of intensive care patients who received this imaging.
CONCLUSION
Increasing use of CT, substantial interinstitutional variation in rates of use of plain radiographs versus CT, and heterogenous timing of magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of the pediatric c-spine demonstrate the growing need for development and implementation of an age-specific c-spine evaluation algorithm to guide judicious use of diagnostic resources.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)