Handoffs and transitions of care: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma

Author:

Appelbaum Rachel D.,Puzio Thaddeus J.,Bauman Zachary,Asfaw Sofya,Spencer Audrey,Dumas Ryan P.,Kaur Kavneet,Cunningham Kyle W.,Butler Dale,Sawhney Jaswin S.,Gadomski Stephen,Horwood Chelsea R.,Stuever Mary,Sapp Alysha,Gandhi Rajesh,Freeman Jennifer

Abstract

BACKGROUND The Joint Commission reports that at least half of communication breakdowns occur during handovers or transitions of care. There is no consensus on how best to approach the transfer of care within acute care surgery (ACS). We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current data on handoffs and transitions of care in ACS patients and evaluate the impact of standardization and formalized communication processes. METHODS Clinically relevant questions regarding handoffs and transitions of care with clearly defined patient Population(s), Intervention(s), Comparison(s), and appropriately selected Outcomes were determined. These centered around specific transitions of care within the setting of ACS, specifically perioperative interactions, emergency medical services and trauma team interactions, and intra/interfloor and intensive care unit (ICU) interactions. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. RESULTS A total of 10 studies were identified for analysis. These included 5,113 patients in the standardized handoff group and 5,293 in the current process group. Standardized handoffs reduced handover errors for perioperative interactions and preventable adverse events for intra/interfloor and ICU interactions. There were insufficient data to evaluate outcomes of clinical complications and medical errors. CONCLUSION We conditionally recommend a standardized handoff in the field of ACS, including perioperative interactions, emergency medical services and trauma team interactions, and intra/interfloor and ICU interactions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Systematic Review/Meta-analysis; Level III.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference16 articles.

1. Patient safety in trauma: maximal impact management errors at a level I trauma center;J Trauma,2008

2. Six sigma methodology and postoperative information reporting: a multidisciplinary quality improvement study with interrupted time-series regression;J Surg Educ,2019

3. Patient handover from surgery to intensive care: using formula 1 pit-stop and aviation models to improve safety and quality;Paediatr Anaesth,2007

4. Standardized multidisciplinary protocol improves handover of cardiac surgery patients to the intensive care unit;Pediatr Crit Care Med,2011

5. The Eastern Association of the Surgery of Trauma approach to practice management guideline development using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology;J Trauma Acute Care Surg,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3