Comparison of Phenobarbital Monotherapy to a Benzodiazepine-based Regimen for Management of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome in Trauma Patients

Author:

Fleenor L. MontanaORCID,Beavers Jennifer R.ORCID,Tidwell William P.,Atchison Leanne,Woo Edward,Medvecz Andrew J.,Beyene Robel T.,Kast Kristopher,Marcovitz David,Dennis Bradley M.,Guillamondegui Oscar D.,Smith Michael C.

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in the trauma population. Benzodiazepines (BZD) are standard of care for AWS; however, given the risk of delirium with BZDs and reports of BZD-refractory withdrawal, phenobarbital (PHB) has emerged as an alternative therapy for AWS. Safety and efficacy studies of PHB for AWS in trauma patients are lacking. Our aim is to compare a BZD versus PHB protocol in the management of AWS in trauma patients. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study at a level 1 trauma center of patients at risk for AWS managed with either a BZD or a low dose oral PHB regimen. Patients were excluded if they were taking benzodiazepines or barbiturates prior to admission, received propofol or dexmedetomidine prior to initiation of the study drug, presented with delirium tremens or seizures, or died or discharged within 24 hours of presentation. The primary outcome was complicated AWS (seizures or alcohol withdrawal delirium/delirium tremens). Secondary outcomes included uncomplicated AWS, therapy escalation, oversedation, delirium-, ICU-, and ventilator-free days, and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS 411 patients were identified; 118 received BZD, and 293 received PHB. The odds of developing complicated AWS with PHB versus BZD-based therapy were not statistically significant (OR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.21-1.39); however, patients receiving PHB were less likely to develop uncomplicated AWS (OR 0.08; 95% CI, 0.04-0.14) and less likely to require escalation of therapy (OR 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.84). The PHB group had a LOS 3.1 days shorter than the BZD group (p = 0.002). There was no difference in ICU-, ventilator-, or delirium-free days. CONCLUSIONS A PHB-based protocol for the management of AWS is a safe and effective alternative to BZD-based regimens in trauma patients. Level of evidence Level IV, retrospective cohort

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3