Author:
Beiriger Jamison,Lu Liling,Silver David,Brown Joshua B.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Air medical transport (AMT) improves outcomes for severely injured patients. The decision to fly patients is complex and must consider multiple factors. Our objective was to evaluate the interaction between geography, patient and environmental factors, and emergency medical services (EMS) system resources on AMT after trauma. We hypothesize that significant geographic variation in AMT utilization will be associated with varying levels of patient, environmental, and EMS resources.
METHODS
Patients transported by EMS in the Pennsylvania state trauma registry 2000 to 2017 were included. We used our previously developed Air Medical Prehospital Triage (AMPT; ≥2 points triage to AMT) score and Geographic Emergency Medical Services Index (GEMSI; higher indicates more system resources) as measures for patient factors and EMS resources, respectively. A mixed-effects logistic regression model determined the association of AMT utilization with patient, system, and environmental variables.
RESULTS
There were 195,354 patients included. Fifty-five percent of variation in AMT utilization was attributed to geographic differences. Triage to AMT by the AMPT score was associated with nearly twice the odds of AMT utilization (adjusted odds ratio, 1.894; 95% confidence interval, 1.765–2.032; p < 0.001). Each 1-point increase in GEMSI was associated with a 6.1% reduction in odds of AMT (0.939; 0.922–0.957; p < 0.001). Younger age, rural location, and more severe injuries were also associated with increased odds of AMT (p < 0.05). When categorized by GEMSI level, the AMPT score and patient factors were more important for predicting AMT utilization in the middle tercile (moderate EMS resources) compared with the lower (low EMS resources) and higher tercile (high EMS resources). Weather, season, time-of-day, and traffic were all associated with AMT utilization (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Patient, system, and environmental factors are associated with AMT utilization, which varies geographically and by EMS/trauma system resource availability. A more comprehensive approach to AMT triage could reduce variation and allow more tailored efforts toward optimizing resource allocation and outcomes.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Surgery
Reference31 articles.
1. National guideline for the field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on field triage, 2021;J Trauma Acute Care Surg,2022
2. Out-of-hospital decision making and factors influencing the regional distribution of injured patients in a trauma system;J Trauma,2011
3. Prehospital trauma triage decision-making: a model of what happens between the 9-1-1 call and the hospital;Prehosp Emerg Care,2016
4. Application of American College of Surgeons' field triage guidelines by pre-hospital personnel;J Am Coll Surg,1995
5. Studies evaluating current field triage: 1966-2005;Prehosp Emerg Care,2006