Vascular Access Complications Associated with Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in Adult Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Shum-Tim Lukas1ORCID,Bichara-Allard Simon1,Hopkins Brent1ORCID,AlShahwan Nawaf1ORCID,Hanley Stephen2ORCID,Manzano-Nunez Ramiro3ORCID,Garcia Alberto F.4,Deckelbaum Dan1,Grushka Jeremy1ORCID,Razek Tarek1ORCID,Fata Paola1ORCID,Khwaja Kosar1ORCID,McKendy Katherine1ORCID,Jastaniah Atif1ORCID,Wong Evan G.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Trauma Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Qc, Canada

2. Division of Vascular Surgery, McGill University, Gatineau, Qc, Canada

3. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

4. Department of Surgery, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia

Abstract

Abstract Background Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is gaining popularity worldwide for managing hypotensive trauma patients. Vascular access complications related to REBOA placement have been reported, with some cases resulting in permanent morbidity. We aim to capitalize on the increase in literature to further describe and estimate the incidence of REBOA-associated vascular access complications in adult trauma patients. Method We searched Medline, EMBASE, Scopus and CINAHL for studies reporting vascular access complications of REBOA in adult trauma patients from inception to Oct 14, 2021. Studies reporting data from adult trauma patients who underwent REBOA insertion were eligible. Exclusion criteria included patients aged 15 and younger, non-trauma patients, non-REBOA use, non-vascular access complications and patient duplication. Study data was abstracted using the PRISMA checklist and verified independently by three reviewers. Metanalysis of proportions was performed using a random effects model with Freeman-Turkey double-arcsine transformation. Post-hoc meta-regression by year of publication, sheath-size, and geographic region was also performed. The incidence of vascular access complications from REBOA insertion was the primary outcome of interest. Subgroup analysis was performed by degree of bias, sheath size, technique of vascular access, provider specialty, geographical region, and publication year. Results 24 articles were included in the systematic review and the meta-analysis, for a total of 675 trauma patients who underwent REBOA insertion. The incidence of vascular access complications was 8% (95% CI [5%-13%]). In post-hoc meta-regression adjusting for year of publication and geographic region, the use of a smaller (7-Fr) sheath was associated with a decreased incidence of vascular access complications (OR 0.87 95CI [0.75-0.99], p = 0.046, R2 = 35%, I2 = 48%). Conclusion This study provides a benchmark for quality of care in terms of vascular access complications related to REBOA insertion in adult trauma patients. Smaller sheath size may be associated with a decrease in vascular access complications. Level of Evidence III Study type: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3