Author:
Zeineddin Ahmad,Tominaga Gail T.,Crandall Marie,Almeida Mariana,Schuster Kevin M.,Jawad Ghassan,Maqbool Baila,Sheffield Abby C.,Dhillon Navpreet K.,Radow Brandon S.,Moorman Matthew L.,Martin Niels D.,Jacovides Christina L.,Lowry Debra,Kaups Krista,Horwood Chelsea R.,Werner Nicole L.,Proaño-Zamudio Jefferson A.,Kaafarani Haytham M. A.,Marshall William A.,Haines Laura N.,Schaffer Kathryn B.,Staudenmayer Kristan L.,Kozar Rosemary A.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Colon Organ Injury Scale (OIS) was updated in 2020 to include a separate OIS for penetrating colon injuries and included imaging criteria. In this multicenter study, we describe the contemporary management and outcomes of penetrating colon injuries and hypothesize that the 2020 OIS system correlates with operative management, complications, and outcomes.
METHODS
This was a retrospective study of patients presenting to 12 Level 1 trauma centers between 2016 and 2020 with penetrating colon injuries and Abbreviated Injury Scale score of <3 in other body regions. We assessed the association of the new OIS with surgical management and clinical outcomes and the association of OIS imaging criteria with operative criteria. Bivariate analysis was done with χ2, analysis of variance, and Kruskal-Wallis, where appropriate. Multivariable models were constructed in a stepwise selection fashion.
RESULTS
We identified 573 patients with penetrating colon injuries. Patients were young and predominantly male; 79% suffered a gunshot injury, 11% had a grade V destructive injury, 19% required ≥6 U of transfusion, 24% had an Injury Severity Score of >15, and 42% had moderate-to-large contamination. Higher OIS was independently associated with a lower likelihood of primary repair, higher likelihood of resection with anastomosis and/or diversion, need for damage-control laparotomy, and higher incidence of abscess, wound infection, extra-abdominal infections, acute kidney injury, and lung injury. Damage control was independently associated with diversion and intra-abdominal and extra-abdominal infections. Preoperative imaging in 152 (27%) cases had a low correlation with operative findings (κ coefficient, 0.13).
CONCLUSION
This is the largest study to date of penetrating colon injuries and the first multicenter validation of the new OIS specific to these injuries. While imaging criteria alone lacked strong predictive value, operative American Association for the Surgery of Trauma OIS colon grade strongly predicted type of interventions and outcomes, supporting use of this grading scale for research and clinical practice.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Surgery