Author:
Haut Elliott R.,Kirby John P.,Bailey Jeffrey A.,Phuong Jimmy,Gavitt Brian,Remick Kyle N.,Staudenmayer Kristan,Cannon Jeremy W.,Price Michelle A.,Bulger Eileen M.,
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2016 report on the trauma care system recommended establishing a National Trauma Research Action Plan to strengthen and guide future trauma research. To address this recommendation, the Department of Defense funded a study to generate a comprehensive research agenda spanning the trauma and burn care continuum. Panels were created to conduct a gap analysis and identify high-priority research questions. The National Trauma Research Action Plan panel reported here addressed trauma systems and informatics.
METHODS
Experts were recruited to identify current gaps in trauma systems research, generate research questions, and establish the priorities using an iterative Delphi survey approach from November 2019 through August 2020. Panelists were identified to ensure heterogeneity and generalizability, including military and civilian representation. Panelists were encouraged to use a PICO format to generate research questions: patient/population, intervention, compare/control, and outcome. In subsequent surveys, panelists prioritized each research question on a 9-point Likert scale, categorized as low-, medium-, and high-priority items. Consensus was defined as ≥60% agreement.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven subject matter experts generated 570 research questions, of which 427 (75%) achieved the consensus threshold. Of the consensus reaching questions, 209 (49%) were rated high priority, 213 (50%) medium priority, and 5 (1%) low priority. Gaps in understanding the broad array of interventions were identified, including those related to health care infrastructure, technology products, education/training, resuscitation, and operative intervention. The prehospital phase of care was highlighted as an area needing focused research.
CONCLUSION
This Delphi gap analysis of trauma systems and informatics research identified high-priority research questions that will help guide investigators and funding agencies in setting research priorities to continue to work toward Zero Preventable Deaths after trauma.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Surgery
Reference35 articles.
1. An analysis of prehospital deaths: who can we save?;J Trauma Acute Care Surg,2014
2. Preventable or potentially preventable mortality at a mature trauma center;J Trauma,2007
3. Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: results from the postadmission critical care research gap Delphi survey;J Trauma Acute Care Surg,2022
4. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality;N Engl J Med,2006
5. Death on the battlefield (2001–2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care;J Trauma Acute Care Surg,2012
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献