Nasal Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Culture Screens in the Setting of Universal Decolonization

Abstract

Introduction The negative predictive value (NPV) of nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screens has been compromised by universal decolonization practices. We aimed to determine the reliability of the nasal MRSA culture screen to deescalate antibiotic therapy in the setting of decolonization with ethyl alcohol. Methodology A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using 62% ethanol solution intranasally per protocol. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether they received decolonization. Data were analyzed to determine NPV of the nasal MRSA culture screen with and without decolonization. Results A total of 505 cases were screened, and 128 subjects were included. One hundred two received decolonization, whereas 26 did not. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Overall MRSA infection prevalence was 31.25%. The NPV was 73% in the decolonized group compared with 80% in the group without. Positive predictive value was 63% in the group receiving decolonization compared with 100% in the group without. There was also a higher specificity but lower sensitivity of the nasal MRSA culture screen in the decolonization group. Nine patients in the decolonization group required reescalation of antibiotics compared with nil in the other group. Conclusions Culture-based nasal MRSA screens are less accurate than PCR tests, as ethyl alcohol leads to false-negative results. A lower NPV in the decolonization group predisposes to increased false negative results, leading to inappropriate antibiotic deescalation and often requiring reinitiation. Nasal MRSA culture screen is less reliable if alcohol has already been administered for decolonization and cannot be used as an appropriate tool to guide antibiotic deescalation.